Understanding the intersection of crime and networks

Criminal networks are defined by the need of their participants to avoid detection. This need to remain undetected makes any data collection about criminal networks very complicated, yet not impossible. In this chapter, we first review three key areas of research on criminal networks: central actors, networks structures, and network dynamics. We follow with a classification of data sources into text-based, log-based, and cyber-based. Each of these data sources is prone to biases, namely delineation of network dynamics, information not missing at random, spotlight effect, and qualitative context integration. These biases reflect the fact that none of the sources is a primary data source. In the practical part, we demonstrate how to carry out research in the three areas by studying a dataset of each of the three types and showing how the biases therein may be dealt with.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CrimRxiv
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.5e32dba2
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the intersection of crime and networks

Tomáš Diviák, Marie Ouellet
CrimRxiv
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

Understanding the intersection of crime and networks

Tomáš Diviák, Marie Ouellet
article en

Abstract

Criminal networks are defined by the need of their participants to avoid detection. This need to remain undetected makes any data collection about criminal networks very complicated, yet not impossible. In this chapter, we first review three key areas of research on criminal networks: central actors, networks structures, and network dynamics. We follow with a classification of data sources into text-based, log-based, and cyber-based. Each of these data sources is prone to biases, namely delineation of network dynamics, information not missing at random, spotlight effect, and qualitative context integration. These biases reflect the fact that none of the sources is a primary data source. In the practical part, we demonstrate how to carry out research in the three areas by studying a dataset of each of the three types and showing how the biases therein may be dealt with.

CrimRxiv
Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.