Effects of noninvasive neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: a scope review

Abstract Background The management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) requires multimodal approaches, combining pharmacological therapies, neuromodulation, and cognitive strategies. Noninvasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are promising and safe conservative treatment options. They act by modulating cortical excitability, relieving pain, and influencing neuroplasticity and pain perception. Objective To map the existing literature on tDCS and TMS resources, as well as dosimetry, protocols used, and clinical results. Methods The databases included were: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS. Gray literature sources included: Google Scholar, Open Grey, and ProQuest. Studies that used tDCS and/or TMS in individuals with CPP were included. There were no restrictions on study design and/or type. There were no restrictions on publication period or language. Duplicates were removed using EndNote and Rayyan QCRI reference managers; remaining records were screened in Rayyan. Two independent reviewers read the titles and abstracts (Phase 1) and read the full studies (Phase 2), and any disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results Twenty-one studies were included in this scoping review. These included four randomized clinical trials, three pilot studies, nine clinical trial protocols, three case studies, and two review studies. Conclusion This scoping review identified 21 studies examining noninvasive neuromodulation for chronic pelvic pain. While included studies generally followed established safety guidelines, substantial methodological heterogeneity exists in dosimetry, protocols, and outcome measurement. Most evidence (57%) consists of study protocols (n=9), pilot studies (n=3), and case reports (n=3), with only 4 completed randomized controlled trials. Preliminary evidence suggests tDCS may reduce pain intensity, but high-quality, large-scale clinical trials with standardized protocols are needed to establish efficacy and optimal treatment parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43161-026-00355-w
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of noninvasive neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: a scope review

Gladson Ricardo Flôr Bertolini, Nicole de Alves, Márcia Rosângela Buzanello, Andersom Ricardo Fréz et al.
Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Effects of noninvasive neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: a scope review

Gladson Ricardo Flôr Bertolini, Nicole de Alves, Márcia Rosângela Buzanello, Andersom Ricardo Fréz, Ana Clara Biederman de Aguiar, Laura Goltz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) requires multimodal approaches, combining pharmacological therapies, neuromodulation, and cognitive strategies. Noninvasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are promising and safe conservative treatment options. They act by modulating cortical excitability, relieving pain, and influencing neuroplasticity and pain perception. Objective To map the existing literature on tDCS and TMS resources, as well as dosimetry, protocols used, and clinical results. Methods The databases included were: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS. Gray literature sources included: Google Scholar, Open Grey, and ProQuest. Studies that used tDCS and/or TMS in individuals with CPP were included. There were no restrictions on study design and/or type. There were no restrictions on publication period or language. Duplicates were removed using EndNote and Rayyan QCRI reference managers; remaining records were screened in Rayyan. Two independent reviewers read the titles and abstracts (Phase 1) and read the full studies (Phase 2), and any disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results Twenty-one studies were included in this scoping review. These included four randomized clinical trials, three pilot studies, nine clinical trial protocols, three case studies, and two review studies. Conclusion This scoping review identified 21 studies examining noninvasive neuromodulation for chronic pelvic pain. While included studies generally followed established safety guidelines, substantial methodological heterogeneity exists in dosimetry, protocols, and outcome measurement. Most evidence (57%) consists of study protocols (n=9), pilot studies (n=3), and case reports (n=3), with only 4 completed randomized controlled trials. Preliminary evidence suggests tDCS may reduce pain intensity, but high-quality, large-scale clinical trials with standardized protocols are needed to establish efficacy and optimal treatment parameters.

Bulletin of Faculty of Physical TherapyVol. 31(1)
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (BR), Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.