The geopolitics of the belt and road initiative and IMEC in the Middle East

Amid ongoing transformations in the global balance of power, large-scale connectivity projects and infrastructural investments have increasingly become key instruments of geopolitical competition. Within this evolving context, geo-economic corridors have emerged as significant arenas through which major powers seek to expand influence, shape regional connectivity, and secure strategic economic interests. Two initiatives have become particularly prominent in this regard: China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the recently proposed India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). The geographic convergence of these corridors across the Middle East has intensified strategic contestation, creating multiple layers of competition at both regional and global levels. This study examines the role of geo-economic corridors within contemporary geopolitical dynamics by addressing a central research question: do such corridors constitute primary drivers of regional conflict, or do they function primarily as instruments embedded within broader geopolitical rivalries among major powers? To explore this question, the study analyzes the spatial intersections between the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), the mechanisms through which corridor-related tensions are managed, the divergent strategic objectives pursued by China and the United States, and the resulting implications for shifting global alignments. Methodologically, the research draws on in-depth qualitative interviews with experts and analysts specializing in regional geopolitics and international relations in order to capture informed perceptions regarding emerging connectivity dynamics. The analysis is guided by geopolitical theory, which provides the conceptual framework for interpreting evolving configurations of power and the reconfiguration of political geography across the Middle East.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Global Society
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00420-8
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The geopolitics of the belt and road initiative and IMEC in the Middle East

Lojain Suliman, Zhàoyuánqí, Yujun XU
Discover Global Society
Belt and Road Initiative
article

The geopolitics of the belt and road initiative and IMEC in the Middle East

Lojain Suliman, Zhàoyuánqí, Yujun XU
article en

Abstract

Amid ongoing transformations in the global balance of power, large-scale connectivity projects and infrastructural investments have increasingly become key instruments of geopolitical competition. Within this evolving context, geo-economic corridors have emerged as significant arenas through which major powers seek to expand influence, shape regional connectivity, and secure strategic economic interests. Two initiatives have become particularly prominent in this regard: China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the recently proposed India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). The geographic convergence of these corridors across the Middle East has intensified strategic contestation, creating multiple layers of competition at both regional and global levels. This study examines the role of geo-economic corridors within contemporary geopolitical dynamics by addressing a central research question: do such corridors constitute primary drivers of regional conflict, or do they function primarily as instruments embedded within broader geopolitical rivalries among major powers? To explore this question, the study analyzes the spatial intersections between the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), the mechanisms through which corridor-related tensions are managed, the divergent strategic objectives pursued by China and the United States, and the resulting implications for shifting global alignments. Methodologically, the research draws on in-depth qualitative interviews with experts and analysts specializing in regional geopolitics and international relations in order to capture informed perceptions regarding emerging connectivity dynamics. The analysis is guided by geopolitical theory, which provides the conceptual framework for interpreting evolving configurations of power and the reconfiguration of political geography across the Middle East.

Discover Global SocietyVol. 4(1)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Chongqing University (CN), Jimei University (CN), Zhejiang Gongshang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.