Tracking Performance Limits Using Multi‐Timescale Maximal Mean Power Ratios

This study introduces a multi-timescale mechanical model to quantify proximity to performance limits during endurance exercise. The model represents power output using a set of rolling averages, each associated with a characteristic time constant, and identifies the dominant component as the one approaching its historical maximum at any given time. To demonstrate this framework, real-world data were collected from 21 male professional cyclists during an 11-day training camp. Data from the first 10 days were used to construct individual maximal mean power (MMP) profiles across multiple time scales. On the final day, cyclists completed a fatiguing protocol (∼2000 kJ of work) followed by 3-min and 12-min maximal time trials. During exercise, the ratio between each exponentially weighted component and its corresponding historical maximum was computed, and the maximum ratio was used to track proximity to performance limits. At the end of the time trials, this ratio reached 98.6% (94.3%-101%) and 101% (98.5%-103%) for the 3-min and 12-min efforts, respectively (median and interquartile range), indicating convergence toward maximal performance capacity. Notably, in both trials the dominant component corresponded to a slower time scale (∼1 h), rather than to components matching the nominal duration of the efforts. These findings suggest that performance limits emerge from the interaction of multiple time scales and are not solely dictated by the duration or intensity of the task. This framework extends the traditional use of MMP from a post hoc descriptive tool to a real-time dynamical measure of performance capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sport Science
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.70179
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking Performance Limits Using Multi‐Timescale Maximal Mean Power Ratios

Borja Martinez‐Gonzalez, Andrea Zignoli, Filip Kolodziej, Andrea Giorgi et al.
European Journal of Sport Science
Sports Performance and Training
article

Tracking Performance Limits Using Multi‐Timescale Maximal Mean Power Ratios

Borja Martinez‐Gonzalez, Andrea Zignoli, Filip Kolodziej, Andrea Giorgi, Peter Leo, Paul B. Laursen
article en

Abstract

This study introduces a multi-timescale mechanical model to quantify proximity to performance limits during endurance exercise. The model represents power output using a set of rolling averages, each associated with a characteristic time constant, and identifies the dominant component as the one approaching its historical maximum at any given time. To demonstrate this framework, real-world data were collected from 21 male professional cyclists during an 11-day training camp. Data from the first 10 days were used to construct individual maximal mean power (MMP) profiles across multiple time scales. On the final day, cyclists completed a fatiguing protocol (∼2000 kJ of work) followed by 3-min and 12-min maximal time trials. During exercise, the ratio between each exponentially weighted component and its corresponding historical maximum was computed, and the maximum ratio was used to track proximity to performance limits. At the end of the time trials, this ratio reached 98.6% (94.3%-101%) and 101% (98.5%-103%) for the 3-min and 12-min efforts, respectively (median and interquartile range), indicating convergence toward maximal performance capacity. Notably, in both trials the dominant component corresponded to a slower time scale (∼1 h), rather than to components matching the nominal duration of the efforts. These findings suggest that performance limits emerge from the interaction of multiple time scales and are not solely dictated by the duration or intensity of the task. This framework extends the traditional use of MMP from a post hoc descriptive tool to a real-time dynamical measure of performance capacity.

European Journal of Sport ScienceVol. 26(6)
Griffith University (AU), University of Verona (IT), University of South Australia (AU), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Trento (IT), University of Agder (NO), University of Kent (GB), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Management Center Innsbruck (AT), Regione Puglia (IT), Toscana Life Sciences (IT), Azienda Usl Toscana Centro (IT), HeliCat Canada (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.