EurA <sub>1c</sub> : a review of 9 years performance of up to 5120 laboratories in 29 country and 26 manufacturer groups according to current and proposed criteria of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets in relation to the use of HbA <sub>1c</sub> for

Abstract Objectives A major objective of the IFCC Committee for Education in the Use of Biomarkers in Diabetes is to monitor the success of global standardization of HbA 1c through benchmark evaluation of the performance by country and manufacturer. Methods From 2016 to 2024 annual trial rounds were organized. Fresh whole blood and lyophilized hemolysate specimens were sent to 29 External Quality Assessment organizers and distributed to up to 5,120 laboratories. Mean results from 2016 to 2024 and from 2024 were evaluated by country and manufacturer, according to current (5 mmol/mol−0.46 %) and proposed (3 mmol/mol−0.28 %) criteria of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets. Results The state of the art in 2024 is an overall bias of 0.6 mmol/mol (0.05 % in NGSP units) with a between laboratory coefficient of variation of 4.0 % (2.7 % in NGSP units). This analytical performance implies that overall 2 % of the laboratories failed to meet the current and 16 % the proposed criterion. Differentiation to country and manufacturer groups showed that 0–10 % of the countries failed to meet the current and 8–35 % the proposed criterion. Of the manufacturers 0–30 % failed to meet the current and 1–58 % the proposed criterion. Results of previous years 2016–2024 were similar. Lyophilized hemolysate specimens were not commutable for some methods. Conclusions The performance of HbA 1c measurement has been stable over the last decade, but substantial differences between country and manufacturer groups were observed. Many met the current criterion, but the picture was mixed when proposing tighter criteria. Whenever possible organizers should use fresh whole blood specimens.

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0276
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EurA 1c : a review of 9 years performance of up to 5120 laboratories in 29 country and 26 manufacturer groups according to current and proposed criteria of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets in relation to the use of HbA 1c for

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Diabetes Management and Education
article

EurA 1c : a review of 9 years performance of up to 5120 laboratories in 29 country and 26 manufacturer groups according to current and proposed criteria of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets in relation to the use of HbA 1c for

article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives A major objective of the IFCC Committee for Education in the Use of Biomarkers in Diabetes is to monitor the success of global standardization of HbA 1c through benchmark evaluation of the performance by country and manufacturer. Methods From 2016 to 2024 annual trial rounds were organized. Fresh whole blood and lyophilized hemolysate specimens were sent to 29 External Quality Assessment organizers and distributed to up to 5,120 laboratories. Mean results from 2016 to 2024 and from 2024 were evaluated by country and manufacturer, according to current (5 mmol/mol−0.46 %) and proposed (3 mmol/mol−0.28 %) criteria of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets. Results The state of the art in 2024 is an overall bias of 0.6 mmol/mol (0.05 % in NGSP units) with a between laboratory coefficient of variation of 4.0 % (2.7 % in NGSP units). This analytical performance implies that overall 2 % of the laboratories failed to meet the current and 16 % the proposed criterion. Differentiation to country and manufacturer groups showed that 0–10 % of the countries failed to meet the current and 8–35 % the proposed criterion. Of the manufacturers 0–30 % failed to meet the current and 1–58 % the proposed criterion. Results of previous years 2016–2024 were similar. Lyophilized hemolysate specimens were not commutable for some methods. Conclusions The performance of HbA 1c measurement has been stable over the last decade, but substantial differences between country and manufacturer groups were observed. Many met the current criterion, but the picture was mixed when proposing tighter criteria. Whenever possible organizers should use fresh whole blood specimens.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EurA <sub>1c</sub> : a review of 9 years performance of up to 5120 laboratories in 29 country and 26 manufacturer groups according to current and proposed criteria of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets in relation to the use of HbA <sub>1c</sub> for · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS