Expert Consensus Develops Multidisciplinary Pathway for Cancer Pain Management in Italy: A Delphi Study

Background: Cancer pain remains highly prevalent and undertreated despite established guidelines. In Italy, Law 38/2010 mandates systematic pain assessment, yet only 26% of clinicians routinely evaluate pain at each clinical visit, and fewer than one-quarter have received formal training in pain medicine or palliative care. A national multidisciplinary roundtable, convened in Rome in March 2025, formally identified four systemic gaps—insufficient education, fragmented care pathways, unclear professional roles, and challenges in implementing shared diagnostic and therapeutic pathways—and planned the development of a structured Delphi consensus. Methods: A Delphi consensus process was undertaken in accordance with CREDES guidelines. The Steering Committee, comprising representatives of six Italian scientific societies (AIRO, AIOM, AISD, Federdolore-SICD, SICP, ACD-SIAARTI) and a patient advocacy group (Fondazione Nora e Alberto Gentili), developed 15 clinical statements addressing pain assessment, management, referral criteria, monitoring, and documentation over five online meetings held between March and September 2025. Sixty-six Italian clinicians from various specialties were invited to participate; the survey was open from 1 October to 31 December 2025, with reminders every 10 days. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (scoring 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale). Results: Fifty-six clinicians completed the survey (response rate: 84.8%), representing medical oncology, radiation oncology, pain therapy, and palliative care specialties; individual statements were rated by 53–54 panelists, as skipping single items was permitted. All statements reached consensus in the first round (77.8–100%), precluding the need for a second voting round. Panelists’ qualitative comments informed minor wording refinements; substantial content was unchanged. Conclusions: The Delphi process produced a validated, multidisciplinary clinical pathway for cancer pain management in the Italian National Health System (NHS). The pathway establishes structured roles for the clinical reference physician and specialist consultants, objective decision thresholds for analgesic titration and referral, and minimum requirements for standardized pain documentation. These consensus-based statements provide actionable clinical guidance that may help address analgesic undertreatment and support the implementation of Law 38/2010 across Italian oncology centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33090507
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert Consensus Develops Multidisciplinary Pathway for Cancer Pain Management in Italy: A Delphi Study

Silvia Natoli, Leonardo Consoletti, Massimo Di Maïo, Ernesto Maranzano et al.
Current Oncology
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Expert Consensus Develops Multidisciplinary Pathway for Cancer Pain Management in Italy: A Delphi Study

Silvia Natoli, Leonardo Consoletti, Massimo Di Maïo, Ernesto Maranzano, Diego Maria Michele Fornasari, Francesco Cellini, Marta Gentili, Marco Krengli, Gianpaolo Fortini
article en

Abstract

Background: Cancer pain remains highly prevalent and undertreated despite established guidelines. In Italy, Law 38/2010 mandates systematic pain assessment, yet only 26% of clinicians routinely evaluate pain at each clinical visit, and fewer than one-quarter have received formal training in pain medicine or palliative care. A national multidisciplinary roundtable, convened in Rome in March 2025, formally identified four systemic gaps—insufficient education, fragmented care pathways, unclear professional roles, and challenges in implementing shared diagnostic and therapeutic pathways—and planned the development of a structured Delphi consensus. Methods: A Delphi consensus process was undertaken in accordance with CREDES guidelines. The Steering Committee, comprising representatives of six Italian scientific societies (AIRO, AIOM, AISD, Federdolore-SICD, SICP, ACD-SIAARTI) and a patient advocacy group (Fondazione Nora e Alberto Gentili), developed 15 clinical statements addressing pain assessment, management, referral criteria, monitoring, and documentation over five online meetings held between March and September 2025. Sixty-six Italian clinicians from various specialties were invited to participate; the survey was open from 1 October to 31 December 2025, with reminders every 10 days. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (scoring 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale). Results: Fifty-six clinicians completed the survey (response rate: 84.8%), representing medical oncology, radiation oncology, pain therapy, and palliative care specialties; individual statements were rated by 53–54 panelists, as skipping single items was permitted. All statements reached consensus in the first round (77.8–100%), precluding the need for a second voting round. Panelists’ qualitative comments informed minor wording refinements; substantial content was unchanged. Conclusions: The Delphi process produced a validated, multidisciplinary clinical pathway for cancer pain management in the Italian National Health System (NHS). The pathway establishes structured roles for the clinical reference physician and specialist consultants, objective decision thresholds for analgesic titration and referral, and minimum requirements for standardized pain documentation. These consensus-based statements provide actionable clinical guidance that may help address analgesic undertreatment and support the implementation of Law 38/2010 across Italian oncology centers.

Current OncologyVol. 33(9)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Milan (IT), University of Pavia (IT), University of Perugia (IT), Fondazione Roma (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia (IT), Italian Society of Physiotherapy (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Associazione Italiana Di Oncologia Medica (IT), Italian Association for Cancer Research (IT), Società Italiana di Reumatologia (IT), Fondazione Audiologica Varese (IT), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), European Association for Palliative Care (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.