Working 9 to 5: The Global Impact of Jobs on Subjective Well-Being

Abstract Occupations that are considered traditionally white-collar (e.g., office jobs) versus occupations that are considered more blue-collar (e.g., manufacturing) have been shown to differ in respect to worker outcomes, with workers in white-collar occupations reporting better health outcomes than workers in blue-collar occupations. This study examines the relationship between job types and subjective well-being (SWB) among workers across 137 countries, utilizing data from five waves of the Gallup World Poll. It compares SWB between traditionally blue-collar (e.g., service workers, construction, manufacturing) and white-collar (e.g., managers, office workers, professionals) occupations and explores variations within these groups. The findings reveal that workers in white-collar occupations report higher current and future SWB than workers in blue-collar occupations, with notable variations across specific job types. Workers in more blue-collar occupations with high physical job demands, such as farm and construction workers, report the lowest SWB, while managers and office workers report the highest. Additionally, the study highlights regional and economic differences, with workers in low-income countries generally reporting lower SWB compared to those in high-income countries. The results also show that even when considering relevant covariates, job type remains significantly associated with well-being. Targeted interventions for workers in blue-collar occupations, especially in lower-income countries, may be beneficial.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-026-10602-w
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working 9 to 5: The Global Impact of Jobs on Subjective Well-Being

Dennis Wesselbaum, Trevin Glasgow, David Leblang
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Working 9 to 5: The Global Impact of Jobs on Subjective Well-Being

Dennis Wesselbaum, Trevin Glasgow, David Leblang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Occupations that are considered traditionally white-collar (e.g., office jobs) versus occupations that are considered more blue-collar (e.g., manufacturing) have been shown to differ in respect to worker outcomes, with workers in white-collar occupations reporting better health outcomes than workers in blue-collar occupations. This study examines the relationship between job types and subjective well-being (SWB) among workers across 137 countries, utilizing data from five waves of the Gallup World Poll. It compares SWB between traditionally blue-collar (e.g., service workers, construction, manufacturing) and white-collar (e.g., managers, office workers, professionals) occupations and explores variations within these groups. The findings reveal that workers in white-collar occupations report higher current and future SWB than workers in blue-collar occupations, with notable variations across specific job types. Workers in more blue-collar occupations with high physical job demands, such as farm and construction workers, report the lowest SWB, while managers and office workers report the highest. Additionally, the study highlights regional and economic differences, with workers in low-income countries generally reporting lower SWB compared to those in high-income countries. The results also show that even when considering relevant covariates, job type remains significantly associated with well-being. Targeted interventions for workers in blue-collar occupations, especially in lower-income countries, may be beneficial.

Applied Research in Quality of Life
University of Otago
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.