Life Cycle and Local Environmental Impacts of Floating Photovoltaic (FPV) Systems

Water-floating solar photovoltaics (FPV) add to renewable energy capacity building without additional land requirements. We quantify the environmental impacts of FPV on inland water bodies with a focus on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water consumption. We harmonize and compare all existing peer-reviewed life cycle assessments on FPV and add two case studies. We consider the full life cycle of FPV, including future (prospective) material recycling options, as well as changes in water evaporation and aquatic GHG emissions at the FPV location. On average, we computed an overall GHG footprint of 36 gCO2 kWh–1, similar to ground-based PV. Biogenic aquatic GHG emissions at the FPV location are expected to contribute a relatively minor share (1%–8%) to the GHG footprint of the FPV systems. Water savings due to prevented evaporation are much higher than the FPV systems’ water consumption. Collectively, our findings support the continued development and deployment of FPV technology to aid the transition toward renewable energy supply.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c17148
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle and Local Environmental Impacts of Floating Photovoltaic (FPV) Systems

Steef V. Hanssen, Mark A.J. Huijbregts, Daniela M. Seitz, Sarian Kosten
Environmental Science & Technology
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Life Cycle and Local Environmental Impacts of Floating Photovoltaic (FPV) Systems

Steef V. Hanssen, Mark A.J. Huijbregts, Daniela M. Seitz, Sarian Kosten
article en

Abstract

Water-floating solar photovoltaics (FPV) add to renewable energy capacity building without additional land requirements. We quantify the environmental impacts of FPV on inland water bodies with a focus on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water consumption. We harmonize and compare all existing peer-reviewed life cycle assessments on FPV and add two case studies. We consider the full life cycle of FPV, including future (prospective) material recycling options, as well as changes in water evaporation and aquatic GHG emissions at the FPV location. On average, we computed an overall GHG footprint of 36 gCO2 kWh–1, similar to ground-based PV. Biogenic aquatic GHG emissions at the FPV location are expected to contribute a relatively minor share (1%–8%) to the GHG footprint of the FPV systems. Water savings due to prevented evaporation are much higher than the FPV systems’ water consumption. Collectively, our findings support the continued development and deployment of FPV technology to aid the transition toward renewable energy supply.

Environmental Science & Technology
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.