An artificial intelligence-augmented multi-criteria decision framework for identifying critical determinants of anti-immigrant attitudes in societal systems

Anti-immigrant attitudes define prejudiced, exclusionary, and discriminatory approaches toward immigrants, and these attitudes have multilayered economic, psychological, and social consequences that threaten social cohesion in societies. The fundamental problem of this study is that, despite the multidimensional nature of the factors fueling anti-immigrant sentiment, there is no clear consensus in the literature on which of these factors are most decisive. This deficiency leads to the ineffectiveness or incompleteness of intervention strategies developed to address anti-immigrant sentiment. Therefore, it is vital to analyze the causes of anti-immigrant attitudes with a more systematic and prioritized approach. In this context, the aim of this study is to identify the most critical factors influencing anti-immigrant attitudes and to develop an innovative fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for this purpose. The scarcity of systematic studies in the literature that rank the relative importance of these factors and the fact that existing studies rely on homogeneous expert opinions form the basis of this research. This study analyzes 11 criteria categorized under economic, cultural, psychological, and social headings. Expert opinions are evaluated using a machine learning-based expert weighting technique, considering demographic characteristics (level of education, experience, etc.). Fractal fuzzy sets are used to model decision-makers' uncertainties more flexibly and realistically, and criterion weights are calculated using the CIMAS (Criteria Impact–Loss Assessment Strategy) method. This unique model contributes to the literature in three ways: (1) Fractal fuzzy sets provide greater representativeness and modeling flexibility; (2) Machine learning-based expert weighting reduces subjectivity and increases the realism of the decision-making process; and (3) The CIMAS method provides a multidimensional and reliable assessment by considering the interactions and losses among the criteria. According to the findings, the populist rhetoric of political actors stands out as the most important factor influencing anti-immigrant attitudes. Furthermore, media representations of immigrants and economic crises also play a decisive role. • Proposes an AI-augmented MCDM framework for anti-immigrant attitudes. • Integrates fractal fuzzy sets with the CIMAS method. • Applies data-driven expert weighting using unsupervised learning. • Identifies political rhetoric as the most critical determinant. • Provides a policy-oriented and uncertainty-aware decision tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102939
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An artificial intelligence-augmented multi-criteria decision framework for identifying critical determinants of anti-immigrant attitudes in societal systems

Hasan Dincer, Enes Olgun, Serkan Eti, Harun Çetinkaya et al.
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

An artificial intelligence-augmented multi-criteria decision framework for identifying critical determinants of anti-immigrant attitudes in societal systems

Hasan Dincer, Enes Olgun, Serkan Eti, Harun Çetinkaya, Serhat Yüksel
article en

Abstract

Anti-immigrant attitudes define prejudiced, exclusionary, and discriminatory approaches toward immigrants, and these attitudes have multilayered economic, psychological, and social consequences that threaten social cohesion in societies. The fundamental problem of this study is that, despite the multidimensional nature of the factors fueling anti-immigrant sentiment, there is no clear consensus in the literature on which of these factors are most decisive. This deficiency leads to the ineffectiveness or incompleteness of intervention strategies developed to address anti-immigrant sentiment. Therefore, it is vital to analyze the causes of anti-immigrant attitudes with a more systematic and prioritized approach. In this context, the aim of this study is to identify the most critical factors influencing anti-immigrant attitudes and to develop an innovative fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for this purpose. The scarcity of systematic studies in the literature that rank the relative importance of these factors and the fact that existing studies rely on homogeneous expert opinions form the basis of this research. This study analyzes 11 criteria categorized under economic, cultural, psychological, and social headings. Expert opinions are evaluated using a machine learning-based expert weighting technique, considering demographic characteristics (level of education, experience, etc.). Fractal fuzzy sets are used to model decision-makers' uncertainties more flexibly and realistically, and criterion weights are calculated using the CIMAS (Criteria Impact–Loss Assessment Strategy) method. This unique model contributes to the literature in three ways: (1) Fractal fuzzy sets provide greater representativeness and modeling flexibility; (2) Machine learning-based expert weighting reduces subjectivity and increases the realism of the decision-making process; and (3) The CIMAS method provides a multidimensional and reliable assessment by considering the interactions and losses among the criteria. According to the findings, the populist rhetoric of political actors stands out as the most important factor influencing anti-immigrant attitudes. Furthermore, media representations of immigrants and economic crises also play a decisive role. • Proposes an AI-augmented MCDM framework for anti-immigrant attitudes. • Integrates fractal fuzzy sets with the CIMAS method. • Applies data-driven expert weighting using unsupervised learning. • Identifies political rhetoric as the most critical determinant. • Provides a policy-oriented and uncertainty-aware decision tool.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
Khazar University (AZ), Cyprus International University (CY), Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Korea University (JP), Marmara University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.