Systemic electioneering from the evangelical pulpit: Evidence from a computational analysis

Religious institutions' engagement in prohibited electoral advocacy is a growing concern for democratic governance. In the United States, such mobilization has been especially visible within the evangelical movement. We examine this phenomenon using a corpus of 88,546 sermons from predominantly evangelical churches, transcribed from 63,683 h of Sunday services spanning the 2020, 2022, and 2024 election cycles and a nonelection control period. Analysis of this corpus reveals that direct political advocacy and endorsements are widespread: 14.7% of churches engaged in this speech during the three months surrounding the 2024 election. This behavior follows a clear electoral rhythm, peaking on the Sunday before Election Day, when 3.5% of churches mobilized. Geographic analysis indicates that advocacy correlates with county partisan composition but lacks strategic targeting; rates in swing states are indistinguishable from those in safe states. Our results provide large-scale quantification of political speech from American pulpits that constitutes prohibited electioneering under current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidelines, revealing a pattern of base mobilization driven by local partisan context rather than national electoral strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2603911123
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic electioneering from the evangelical pulpit: Evidence from a computational analysis

Samuel Wolken, Yphtach Lelkes, Marc S. Jacob, Sean J. Westwood
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Systemic electioneering from the evangelical pulpit: Evidence from a computational analysis

Samuel Wolken, Yphtach Lelkes, Marc S. Jacob, Sean J. Westwood
article en

Abstract

Religious institutions' engagement in prohibited electoral advocacy is a growing concern for democratic governance. In the United States, such mobilization has been especially visible within the evangelical movement. We examine this phenomenon using a corpus of 88,546 sermons from predominantly evangelical churches, transcribed from 63,683 h of Sunday services spanning the 2020, 2022, and 2024 election cycles and a nonelection control period. Analysis of this corpus reveals that direct political advocacy and endorsements are widespread: 14.7% of churches engaged in this speech during the three months surrounding the 2024 election. This behavior follows a clear electoral rhythm, peaking on the Sunday before Election Day, when 3.5% of churches mobilized. Geographic analysis indicates that advocacy correlates with county partisan composition but lacks strategic targeting; rates in swing states are indistinguishable from those in safe states. Our results provide large-scale quantification of political speech from American pulpits that constitutes prohibited electioneering under current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidelines, revealing a pattern of base mobilization driven by local partisan context rather than national electoral strategy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(21)
University of Notre Dame (US), Dartmouth College (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Dartmouth Hospital (GB)
Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systemic electioneering from the evangelical pulpit: Evidence from a computational analysis — Samuel Wolken, Yphtach Lelkes, et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS