The effect of provenance and species on the chemical composition of <i>Epilobium</i> herbal tea
BACKGROUND: herb are widely consumed in Europe for prostate-related and anti-inflammatory effects. However, they are often sold under generic names without clear species differentiation or quality specifications, raising concerns about chemical consistency and therapeutic equivalence. OBJECTIVE: products and refine the framework for quality marker selection by integrating pharmacological relevance with structural assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pan-Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) structural filters. RESULTS: < 0.05). Flavonol glycosides (e.g., hyperoside, isoquercitrin) also varied substantially. Although species identity influenced phenolic profiles, overlapping concentration ranges indicated a lack of chemical equivalence among products. Geographic origin contributed additional but secondary variability. DISCUSSION: Oenothein B, hyperoside, and isoquercitrin were identified as priority quality markers based on abundance and analytical suitability. Structural reassessment demonstrated that pharmacological ranking alone may be misleading for polyphenol-rich matrices due to redox-related interference. CONCLUSION: teas differ chemically and are not interchangeable. A structure-informed approach is essential for reliable quality assessment and for aligning commercial products with pharmacopeial standards.
Authors
- Zigmantas Gudžinskas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6230-5924)
- M Heinrich
- B Jalil
- Kateryna Uminska
- Liudas Ivanauskas
- Olha Mykhailenko
Institutions
- Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
- American Pharmacists Association (US)
- National University of Pharmacy (UA)
- Chinese Medical Center (US)
- Nature Research Centre (LT)
- Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University (UA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Pharmaceutical Biology
- Published
- 2026-05-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2026.2672676
- Primary Topic
- Heavy Metals in Plants
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00