Comparison of pain perception and heart rate between Dentapen and Vibraject during local anesthesia administration in adult patients: a randomized clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: The management of pain in dental procedures is crucial, as local anesthetic injections may induce patient anxiety and discomfort. Various techniques including Vibraject and Dentapen have been devised to alleviate injection discomfort. This study aimed to assess patient-reported pain perception levels during local anesthetic administration in the maxilla using Vibraject-assisted injection and the Dentapen system in ramp-up mode. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 40 participants were enrolled in the study, with each participant receiving two different injections, thereby evaluating 80 sites in total. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo both types of injection, one on either side of the maxilla, next to the first molar. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) immediately following each injection, and heart rate measurements were recorded pre- and post-local anesthetic administration. The patients' preferences for injection methods were also documented. RESULTS: Analysis revealed a higher preference for Dentapen (62.5%) compared to Vibraject (37.5%). Heart rate measurements showed a statistically significant increase after Dentapen injection (P = .010), while insignificant differences were observed in heart rate measurements between Vibraject and overall heart rate measurements (P > .05). The mean VAS score for Vibraject (2.175) was slightly higher than Dentapen (1.550), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .105). CONCLUSIONS: Dentapen was favored by the majority of participants. Results revealed a significant increase in heart rate following Dentapen injection. However, there was an insignificant difference in pain perception between the two methods. These findings emphasize the importance of patient preferences during local anesthesia administration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b7010719
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of pain perception and heart rate between Dentapen and Vibraject during local anesthesia administration in adult patients: a randomized clinical study.

Ammar AbuMostafa, Hassan Almuashi
PubMed
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
article

Comparison of pain perception and heart rate between Dentapen and Vibraject during local anesthesia administration in adult patients: a randomized clinical study.

Ammar AbuMostafa, Hassan Almuashi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The management of pain in dental procedures is crucial, as local anesthetic injections may induce patient anxiety and discomfort. Various techniques including Vibraject and Dentapen have been devised to alleviate injection discomfort. This study aimed to assess patient-reported pain perception levels during local anesthetic administration in the maxilla using Vibraject-assisted injection and the Dentapen system in ramp-up mode. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 40 participants were enrolled in the study, with each participant receiving two different injections, thereby evaluating 80 sites in total. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo both types of injection, one on either side of the maxilla, next to the first molar. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) immediately following each injection, and heart rate measurements were recorded pre- and post-local anesthetic administration. The patients' preferences for injection methods were also documented. RESULTS: Analysis revealed a higher preference for Dentapen (62.5%) compared to Vibraject (37.5%). Heart rate measurements showed a statistically significant increase after Dentapen injection (P = .010), while insignificant differences were observed in heart rate measurements between Vibraject and overall heart rate measurements (P > .05). The mean VAS score for Vibraject (2.175) was slightly higher than Dentapen (1.550), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .105). CONCLUSIONS: Dentapen was favored by the majority of participants. Results revealed a significant increase in heart rate following Dentapen injection. However, there was an insignificant difference in pain perception between the two methods. These findings emphasize the importance of patient preferences during local anesthesia administration.

PubMedVol. 57(5)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.