Impact of legislative reform on coercive measure use in child and adolescent psychiatry: A controlled interrupted time series analysis

Evidence on legislative reforms to reduce coercive measures remains limited. We evaluated short-to-medium-term effects of Sweden's July 2020 stricter legal regulation of coercive measures in youth < 18 years. In a controlled interrupted time-series study, we used 2017-2021 registry and electronic medical record data from inpatient child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Region Stockholm, Sweden. Controls included Finnish CAMHS and Region Stockholm young adult psychiatric patients (18-24 years). Monthly outcomes were rates of seclusion, mechanical restraint, involuntary medication and a composite measure, mean durations, and sedative medication use. Segmented regression estimated level- and trend changes, adjusting for pre-intervention trends. Among 7,075 admissions (3,840 individuals) to Stockholm inpatient CAMHS, involuntary medication increased immediately in minors relative to young adults (incidence rate ratio 2.49, 95% CI 1.63-3.81), with no other changes in patient-day-standardised models. Comparisons with Finnish CAHMS provided no consistent evidence of reduced coercion. Mean durations also increased in minors versus young adults (12% for seclusion; 6% for mechanical restraint), while sedative medication use remained stable. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. Contrary to the reform's aims, stricter legislation alone was not associated with reduced coercive measure use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-03035-1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of legislative reform on coercive measure use in child and adolescent psychiatry: A controlled interrupted time series analysis

Niklas Långström, Astrid Moell, Erik Pettersson, Riittakerttu Kaltiala
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Impact of legislative reform on coercive measure use in child and adolescent psychiatry: A controlled interrupted time series analysis

Niklas Långström, Astrid Moell, Erik Pettersson, Riittakerttu Kaltiala
article en

Abstract

Evidence on legislative reforms to reduce coercive measures remains limited. We evaluated short-to-medium-term effects of Sweden's July 2020 stricter legal regulation of coercive measures in youth < 18 years. In a controlled interrupted time-series study, we used 2017-2021 registry and electronic medical record data from inpatient child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Region Stockholm, Sweden. Controls included Finnish CAMHS and Region Stockholm young adult psychiatric patients (18-24 years). Monthly outcomes were rates of seclusion, mechanical restraint, involuntary medication and a composite measure, mean durations, and sedative medication use. Segmented regression estimated level- and trend changes, adjusting for pre-intervention trends. Among 7,075 admissions (3,840 individuals) to Stockholm inpatient CAMHS, involuntary medication increased immediately in minors relative to young adults (incidence rate ratio 2.49, 95% CI 1.63-3.81), with no other changes in patient-day-standardised models. Comparisons with Finnish CAHMS provided no consistent evidence of reduced coercion. Mean durations also increased in minors versus young adults (12% for seclusion; 6% for mechanical restraint), while sedative medication use remained stable. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. Contrary to the reform's aims, stricter legislation alone was not associated with reduced coercive measure use.

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Tampere University (FI), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Vanha Vaasa hospital (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE)
Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.