Mind the gap: Thinking through a participatory action research project in Eastern Uganda

This article originates from a sense of dissatisfaction with the outcomes of a participatory action research project we undertook in Eastern Uganda, concerned with land and water access. We are proud of the research: its design, the process we engaged in, our conduct, the relationships we formed, and our endeavour to engender meaningful change. And yet we are left wondering what the project actually achieved. To better understand this dissatisfaction, we review the literature that constitutes the context for the project – participatory action research, scholar activism, and decolonising methodologies. We bring this literature into conversation with our own project in order to shed light on the gap between aspirations and outcomes. Our hope is that this critical exploration, and the advice we offer, contributes to a better understanding of the possibilities and limitations of both participatory research and of Westernised research in the Global South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning F
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825261445721
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind the gap: Thinking through a participatory action research project in Eastern Uganda

Luke Whaley, Flavia Amayo, Lillian Mbabazi
Environment and Planning F
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Mind the gap: Thinking through a participatory action research project in Eastern Uganda

Luke Whaley, Flavia Amayo, Lillian Mbabazi
article en

Abstract

This article originates from a sense of dissatisfaction with the outcomes of a participatory action research project we undertook in Eastern Uganda, concerned with land and water access. We are proud of the research: its design, the process we engaged in, our conduct, the relationships we formed, and our endeavour to engender meaningful change. And yet we are left wondering what the project actually achieved. To better understand this dissatisfaction, we review the literature that constitutes the context for the project – participatory action research, scholar activism, and decolonising methodologies. We bring this literature into conversation with our own project in order to shed light on the gap between aspirations and outcomes. Our hope is that this critical exploration, and the advice we offer, contributes to a better understanding of the possibilities and limitations of both participatory research and of Westernised research in the Global South.

Environment and Planning F
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Makerere University (UG), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Global Challenges Research Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.