Framing the future of search: A discourse analysis of Google’s AI Overviews

This study investigates how Google’s AI Overviews (AIOs) – a major shift in the search engine landscape – are discursively framed by three key actors: Google, tech journalists, and Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) marketers. Drawing on platform studies and discourse theory, we combine Leximancer concept mapping with Critical Discourse Analysis to examine how these stakeholders construct, legitimise, and contest the meaning of AIOs across a broad corpus of grey literature, media coverage, and corporate blogs. Our findings reveal four dominant thematic frames: Generative AI Technologies and AI-Platform Wars, Reconfiguring Search: Let Google Do the Searching for You, Commercial Implications of AIOs, and AI Overviews – Utopia versus Dystopia. While Google frames AIOs as seamless innovations that enhance the user experience, journalists highlight issues of misinformation and epistemic opacity, and SEO marketers focus on the economic and strategic disruptions to visibility and discoverability. Crucially, our analysis underscores the absence of the user’s voice and a lack of attention to democratic, societal and environmental implications of AI-generated summaries. By analysing the discourse surrounding AIOs, this paper demonstrates that AIOs are not merely a new feature, but rather part of a broader shift in platform power and control over online knowledge. We argue that AIOs represent a key moment in the transformation of search, reshaping how trust, authority, and visibility are defined and challenged in the age of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse & Communication
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813261447684
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing the future of search: A discourse analysis of Google’s AI Overviews

Ashwin Nagappa, Shir Weinbrand, Daniel Angus
Discourse & Communication
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Framing the future of search: A discourse analysis of Google’s AI Overviews

Ashwin Nagappa, Shir Weinbrand, Daniel Angus
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how Google’s AI Overviews (AIOs) – a major shift in the search engine landscape – are discursively framed by three key actors: Google, tech journalists, and Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) marketers. Drawing on platform studies and discourse theory, we combine Leximancer concept mapping with Critical Discourse Analysis to examine how these stakeholders construct, legitimise, and contest the meaning of AIOs across a broad corpus of grey literature, media coverage, and corporate blogs. Our findings reveal four dominant thematic frames: Generative AI Technologies and AI-Platform Wars, Reconfiguring Search: Let Google Do the Searching for You, Commercial Implications of AIOs, and AI Overviews – Utopia versus Dystopia. While Google frames AIOs as seamless innovations that enhance the user experience, journalists highlight issues of misinformation and epistemic opacity, and SEO marketers focus on the economic and strategic disruptions to visibility and discoverability. Crucially, our analysis underscores the absence of the user’s voice and a lack of attention to democratic, societal and environmental implications of AI-generated summaries. By analysing the discourse surrounding AIOs, this paper demonstrates that AIOs are not merely a new feature, but rather part of a broader shift in platform power and control over online knowledge. We argue that AIOs represent a key moment in the transformation of search, reshaping how trust, authority, and visibility are defined and challenged in the age of AI.

Discourse & Communication
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.