An exploratory study on portion size estimation errors: psychological correlates of portion size estimation errors in a non-clinical sample with normal-weight

PURPOSE: Accurate perception of food portion sizes is implicated in healthy eating, yet little is known about psychological correlates of portion estimation in non-clinical, normal-weight adults. This exploratory study examined whether consumption intent (self vs other) and markers of psychological processes associated with eating (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, body dissatisfaction) are associated with portion size estimation errors, and whether these errors relate to body mass index (BMI). METHODS: ) without current or past psychiatric disorders were included. Eating psychopathology was assessed using the brief 7-item, 3-factor version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (Dietary Restraint, Shape/Weight Overvaluation, Body Dissatisfaction). Portion estimation was measured with the Portion Estimation Task, with images rated on a visual analog scale (0-100) under two conditions: general intent (for others) and intent-to-eat (for self). A proportional estimation error index was calculated across all non-full portion sizes relative to each participant's full-portion reference. A linear mixed model tested the effect of intent and Pearson correlations examined the association with psychological variables and BMI. RESULTS: = 0.27, p = 0.021), but not with Shape/Weight Overvaluation or Body Dissatisfaction. BMI correlated with Shape/Weight Overvaluation and Body Dissatisfaction, but not with Dietary Restraint or the Estimation Error Index. CONCLUSION: In normal-weight adults without eating disorders, greater dietary restraint is associated with larger biases in portion size estimation, whereas BMI and body-related evaluative concerns primarily track weight status rather than perceptual errors in portion size estimations. Findings are exploratory and warrant replication in larger, more diverse samples. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-026-01864-2
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An exploratory study on portion size estimation errors: psychological correlates of portion size estimation errors in a non-clinical sample with normal-weight

Stéphanie Haymoz, Dany Laure Wadji, Mayron Piccolo, Christophe Mueller-Pfeiffer et al.
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

An exploratory study on portion size estimation errors: psychological correlates of portion size estimation errors in a non-clinical sample with normal-weight

Stéphanie Haymoz, Dany Laure Wadji, Mayron Piccolo, Christophe Mueller-Pfeiffer, Tanya Tandon, Chantal Martin-Soelch, Gabriella Milos
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate perception of food portion sizes is implicated in healthy eating, yet little is known about psychological correlates of portion estimation in non-clinical, normal-weight adults. This exploratory study examined whether consumption intent (self vs other) and markers of psychological processes associated with eating (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, body dissatisfaction) are associated with portion size estimation errors, and whether these errors relate to body mass index (BMI). METHODS: ) without current or past psychiatric disorders were included. Eating psychopathology was assessed using the brief 7-item, 3-factor version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (Dietary Restraint, Shape/Weight Overvaluation, Body Dissatisfaction). Portion estimation was measured with the Portion Estimation Task, with images rated on a visual analog scale (0-100) under two conditions: general intent (for others) and intent-to-eat (for self). A proportional estimation error index was calculated across all non-full portion sizes relative to each participant's full-portion reference. A linear mixed model tested the effect of intent and Pearson correlations examined the association with psychological variables and BMI. RESULTS: = 0.27, p = 0.021), but not with Shape/Weight Overvaluation or Body Dissatisfaction. BMI correlated with Shape/Weight Overvaluation and Body Dissatisfaction, but not with Dietary Restraint or the Estimation Error Index. CONCLUSION: In normal-weight adults without eating disorders, greater dietary restraint is associated with larger biases in portion size estimation, whereas BMI and body-related evaluative concerns primarily track weight status rather than perceptual errors in portion size estimations. Findings are exploratory and warrant replication in larger, more diverse samples. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies.

Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
Cambridge Health Alliance (US), Harvard University (US), William James College (US), University of Fribourg (CH), Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA), University of Zurich (CH), Cégep de Rimouski (CA), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Bundesbehörden der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.