Advancing Personalized Intrathecal Therapy: A Quasi-Experimental Study for the Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Pain in Ultrasound-Guided Versus Template-Guided Refill Techniques

Background: Traditional refills of intrathecal infusion pumps rely on manual palpation and the use of external templates, a method that can be challenging in patients with anatomical variations or a high body mass index. Ultrasound guidance has emerged as a precision-based alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the ultrasound-guided technique versus the conventional template-based technique on patient satisfaction. Methods: A quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted on a cohort of 45 chronic pain patients. Immediate satisfaction with procedure duration (IPP-SQ), overall treatment efficacy (CRES-4), and pain interference via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were assessed. Results: The use of ultrasound was associated with significantly higher satisfaction regarding procedure duration, with a mean score of 5.00 (95% CI: 4.35–5.65) compared to 3.22 (95% CI: 2.70–3.75) with the traditional method (p < 0.001). Overall satisfaction (CRES-4) also improved significantly (12.4 vs. 11.3; p = 0.001). Regarding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the mean pain intensity in the subsequent week was lower following the ultrasound technique (mean difference −0.48; p = 0.040). Technically, no first-attempt failures were recorded under ultrasound guidance in this sample, compared to a 20% re-attempt rate observed with the manual method. Conclusions: The transition from the traditional method to ultrasound-guided refill optimizes technical precision and substantially enhances the patient experience. By reducing pain and increasing satisfaction, ultrasound guidance proves to be a valuable resource for improving procedural precision, representing an advancement toward a more personalized medicine approach.