Scale Versus Technology—M&A Effects by Firm Size and Ex‐Post M&A Time Horizon in Korea

ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the effects of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on technical change (TC) and the scale component (SC)—the two primary constituents of total factor productivity (TFP)—by firm size and ex‐post M&A time horizon (i.e., short‐term vs. long‐term effects). We conduct an empirical analysis on Korean firms using a covariate balancing propensity score methodology, which is the most advanced technique for propensity score matching. The main finding is that while firms can achieve technological advancements through M&A, they may not achieve optimal scale. Moreover, we find that large firms have M&A motives from a long‐term perspective and perform M&A due to technological motives, while small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) have M&A motives from a short‐term perspective for a one‐point solution. This suggests that the motives of M&A are not uniform across large firms and SMEs and that they may prioritise different strategic objectives when undertaking M&A transactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.70048
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scale Versus Technology—M&A Effects by Firm Size and Ex‐Post M&A Time Horizon in Korea

Sungdo Jung, Hyundo Choi, Dong‐hyun Oh, Sinwoo Lee et al.
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Scale Versus Technology—M&A Effects by Firm Size and Ex‐Post M&A Time Horizon in Korea

Sungdo Jung, Hyundo Choi, Dong‐hyun Oh, Sinwoo Lee, Soyoung Kim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the effects of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on technical change (TC) and the scale component (SC)—the two primary constituents of total factor productivity (TFP)—by firm size and ex‐post M&A time horizon (i.e., short‐term vs. long‐term effects). We conduct an empirical analysis on Korean firms using a covariate balancing propensity score methodology, which is the most advanced technique for propensity score matching. The main finding is that while firms can achieve technological advancements through M&A, they may not achieve optimal scale. Moreover, we find that large firms have M&A motives from a long‐term perspective and perform M&A due to technological motives, while small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) have M&A motives from a short‐term perspective for a one‐point solution. This suggests that the motives of M&A are not uniform across large firms and SMEs and that they may prioritise different strategic objectives when undertaking M&A transactions.

Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Inha University (KR), Dongguk University (KR), Korea Medicine Research Institute (KR), Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.