ENLIL: A Post-Quantum Signed Deliberative Multi-Model AI Council for Accountable Decision Support

Current AI decision-support systems produce answers from a single model, offering no mechanism for deliberation, structured dissent, or cryptographic auditability. Regulatory frameworks such as NIS2 and DORA increasingly require organizations to demonstrate that AI-assisted decisions are traceable, auditable, and tamper-evident. We present ENLIL, a production system that convenes a council of nine specialized AI models to deliberate on each query in parallel, producing a consensus Decree signed with ML-DSA-87 (FIPS 204, NIST post-quantum standard). A reinforcement learning router dynamically allocates models based on domain classification and historical prediction error. Explicit dissent tracking surfaces minority positions in the final output, enabling senior reviewers to identify contested reasoning at a glance. The full nine-model deliberation completes in under 150 seconds; the resulting PDF is cryptographically signed and audit-ready. A tiered budget system (2, 4, or 9 models) makes the architecture economically viable from startup to enterprise deployments at approximately €0.20 per full-tier Decree. 237 automated tests pass at 100%. ENLIL is deployed in production at enlil-council.com.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20276125
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENLIL: A Post-Quantum Signed Deliberative Multi-Model AI Council for Accountable Decision Support

Miguel Angel Concha Estrada
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

ENLIL: A Post-Quantum Signed Deliberative Multi-Model AI Council for Accountable Decision Support

Miguel Angel Concha Estrada
article en

Abstract

Current AI decision-support systems produce answers from a single model, offering no mechanism for deliberation, structured dissent, or cryptographic auditability. Regulatory frameworks such as NIS2 and DORA increasingly require organizations to demonstrate that AI-assisted decisions are traceable, auditable, and tamper-evident. We present ENLIL, a production system that convenes a council of nine specialized AI models to deliberate on each query in parallel, producing a consensus Decree signed with ML-DSA-87 (FIPS 204, NIST post-quantum standard). A reinforcement learning router dynamically allocates models based on domain classification and historical prediction error. Explicit dissent tracking surfaces minority positions in the final output, enabling senior reviewers to identify contested reasoning at a glance. The full nine-model deliberation completes in under 150 seconds; the resulting PDF is cryptographically signed and audit-ready. A tiered budget system (2, 4, or 9 models) makes the architecture economically viable from startup to enterprise deployments at approximately €0.20 per full-tier Decree. 237 automated tests pass at 100%. ENLIL is deployed in production at enlil-council.com.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.