Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC), Workplace Mental Health (MH) Stigma and Psychological Distress Among Canadian Employees: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Objective: To examine the association between PSC and psychological distress, and decompose this relationship into direct, indirect and interaction pathways involving workplace MH stigma. Method: A cross-sectional survey assessed 999 Canadian workers. Mediation was explored using a model-based potential outcomes approach, while moderation was analysed via logistic regression. Results: The risk difference in psychological distress between high- and low-risk PSC environments was 0.122. Of this effect, 66.7% was direct, 12.9% was mediated by stigma, and 20.4% reflected PSC–stigma interaction. The stigma–distress association was stronger in high-risk PSC environments (OR = 3.58 [1.91–6.70]) than in low-risk environments (OR = 2.10 [1.04–4.23]). Conclusions: The majority of the association between PSC and distress is not via MH stigma, while the strength of the stigma–distress association varied by PSC level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000003757
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC), Workplace Mental Health (MH) Stigma and Psychological Distress Among Canadian Employees: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

May Young Loh, Shufei Song, Marta Pienkowski, Maureen Dollard et al.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC), Workplace Mental Health (MH) Stigma and Psychological Distress Among Canadian Employees: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

May Young Loh, Shufei Song, Marta Pienkowski, Maureen Dollard, Amy Zadow, Peter Smith
article en

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between PSC and psychological distress, and decompose this relationship into direct, indirect and interaction pathways involving workplace MH stigma. Method: A cross-sectional survey assessed 999 Canadian workers. Mediation was explored using a model-based potential outcomes approach, while moderation was analysed via logistic regression. Results: The risk difference in psychological distress between high- and low-risk PSC environments was 0.122. Of this effect, 66.7% was direct, 12.9% was mediated by stigma, and 20.4% reflected PSC–stigma interaction. The stigma–distress association was stronger in high-risk PSC environments (OR = 3.58 [1.91–6.70]) than in low-risk environments (OR = 2.10 [1.04–4.23]). Conclusions: The majority of the association between PSC and distress is not via MH stigma, while the strength of the stigma–distress association varied by PSC level.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Public Health Ontario (CA), Institute for Work & Health (CA), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.