Analyzing infection prevention and control program in Egyptian university hospitals: strengths and areas for improvement

Abstract Background Healthcare-associated infections are a major global health problem. Published international guidelines aim to provide technical support for countries and healthcare facilities to implement efficient infection prevention and control (IPC) programs and evaluate them. Aim This study aims to evaluate Egyptian university hospitals’ current IPC program and activities status, using an international standardized tool. Afterwards, the identification of existing strengths and weaknesses of the IPC program is needed for improvement. Method A cross-sectional study design using a convenience sample to assess the implementation of the IPC program at 26 healthcare facilities running the IPC activities for at least 5 years, amounting to > 11,000 beds, from four selected Egyptian Universities. The WHO IPCAF assessment tool and scoring were used to assess the level of compliance for each core component. Results The weighted median of participating facilities was 600 ( IQR = 571.25–646.88). The arithmetic mean of participating facilities was 587.19. None of the studied facilities had an inadequate level of IPC, and (50%) of facilities showed an advanced level. IPC guidelines had the highest mean score (83.46%), followed by the IPC program (76.73%). On the other hand, the multimodal strategies in IPC had the lowest mean score (65.57%) following the IPC training and education (69.23%). Conclusion Although the IPC program is appropriately implemented in the studied hospitals, some challenges exist, and enhancement of multidisciplinary integration optimizes multimodal IPC strategies, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship, training programs, and monitoring and feedback systems are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-026-01758-z
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing infection prevention and control program in Egyptian university hospitals: strengths and areas for improvement

Nesrine Fathi Hanafi, Asmaa Abdel- Aziz, Mahmod Arabi, Moustapha Ramadan et al.
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Analyzing infection prevention and control program in Egyptian university hospitals: strengths and areas for improvement

Nesrine Fathi Hanafi, Asmaa Abdel- Aziz, Mahmod Arabi, Moustapha Ramadan, Abeer Ezzat Elsayed, Hoda Mohamed Owais, Amany Mohamed Aboelenein
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare-associated infections are a major global health problem. Published international guidelines aim to provide technical support for countries and healthcare facilities to implement efficient infection prevention and control (IPC) programs and evaluate them. Aim This study aims to evaluate Egyptian university hospitals’ current IPC program and activities status, using an international standardized tool. Afterwards, the identification of existing strengths and weaknesses of the IPC program is needed for improvement. Method A cross-sectional study design using a convenience sample to assess the implementation of the IPC program at 26 healthcare facilities running the IPC activities for at least 5 years, amounting to > 11,000 beds, from four selected Egyptian Universities. The WHO IPCAF assessment tool and scoring were used to assess the level of compliance for each core component. Results The weighted median of participating facilities was 600 ( IQR = 571.25–646.88). The arithmetic mean of participating facilities was 587.19. None of the studied facilities had an inadequate level of IPC, and (50%) of facilities showed an advanced level. IPC guidelines had the highest mean score (83.46%), followed by the IPC program (76.73%). On the other hand, the multimodal strategies in IPC had the lowest mean score (65.57%) following the IPC training and education (69.23%). Conclusion Although the IPC program is appropriately implemented in the studied hospitals, some challenges exist, and enhancement of multidisciplinary integration optimizes multimodal IPC strategies, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship, training programs, and monitoring and feedback systems are required.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection ControlVol. 15(1)
Suez Canal University (EG), Tanta University (EG), Alexandria University (EG), Assiut University (EG)
Alexandria University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.