From Compliance to Competitive (Dis)Advantage? The Transformation of Corporate Sustainability Reporting

ABSTRACT The tightening of EU sustainability reporting rules has raised a controversial debate between improving corporate transparency and the risk of stifling competitiveness, with ongoing EU‐wide discussions on potential deregulation. We contribute to this debate by examining changes in sustainability reporting practices over time. By using a hand‐collected dataset of German listed firms, we find that sustainability reporting has changed substantially over time. Sustainability reporting among sample firms increased from 7% in 2010 to 59% in 2022. Additionally, about 65% of these reports address climate‐related goals, and we find substantial differences in volume and scope between mandatory and voluntary disclosers. However, we do not find that the introduction of mandatory sustainability reporting is associated with a competitive disadvantage. These findings could help policymakers evaluate the tradeoff in sustainability reporting between high transparency and potential competitive disadvantages to balance regulatory ambition and economic feasibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Change
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.70073
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Compliance to Competitive (Dis)Advantage? The Transformation of Corporate Sustainability Reporting

Martin Thomsen, Mareike Hockmann
Strategic Change
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

From Compliance to Competitive (Dis)Advantage? The Transformation of Corporate Sustainability Reporting

Martin Thomsen, Mareike Hockmann
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The tightening of EU sustainability reporting rules has raised a controversial debate between improving corporate transparency and the risk of stifling competitiveness, with ongoing EU‐wide discussions on potential deregulation. We contribute to this debate by examining changes in sustainability reporting practices over time. By using a hand‐collected dataset of German listed firms, we find that sustainability reporting has changed substantially over time. Sustainability reporting among sample firms increased from 7% in 2010 to 59% in 2022. Additionally, about 65% of these reports address climate‐related goals, and we find substantial differences in volume and scope between mandatory and voluntary disclosers. However, we do not find that the introduction of mandatory sustainability reporting is associated with a competitive disadvantage. These findings could help policymakers evaluate the tradeoff in sustainability reporting between high transparency and potential competitive disadvantages to balance regulatory ambition and economic feasibility.

Strategic Change
University of Siegen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Compliance to Competitive (Dis)Advantage? The Transformation of Corporate Sustainability Reporting — Martin Thomsen, Mareike Hockmann · Strategic Change (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS