Role of systemic corticosteroids in ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Purpose The recommendation regarding systemic corticosteroids in ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is unknown since most studies have excluded ventilated patients. Our study aims to investigate whether systemic steroids benefit the subgroup of AECOPD who require ventilation. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for randomized trials or observational studies comparing systemic steroids to placebo or no systemic steroids, up to April 2025. Outcomes of interest were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, length of ICU stay, duration of ventilation, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure rate, hyperglycemia episodes, and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Results Six studies including 1596 ventilated AECOPD patients (including subgroups from larger ICU populations), were included in the systematic review. Of these 1424 contributed to the quantitative synthesis of at least one outcome. We performed sensitivity analysis for study type and mode of ventilation. ICU mortality was not significantly decreased in the systemic steroid group compared to placebo or no systemic steroids (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.09; 95% CI 0.62–1.91; p = 0.78; I²=0.0%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for duration of ventilation (Mean difference (MD) = -2.24; 95% CI -5.13 to 0.66; p = 0.13; I²=78.7%). In the subgroup of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systemic steroids were associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (MD = -1.12 days; 95% CI -2.23 to 0.00; p = 0.049; I² = 59.9%). There was no difference between groups for length of ICU stay (MD = -1.60; 95% CI -3.32 to 0.12; p = 0.068; I²=68.5%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for NIV failure (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.17; 95% CI 0.83–1.67; p = 0.37; I²=58.1%). Hyperglycemia episodes were significantly higher in the steroid group (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.56 to 3.62; p < 0.001; I²=0.0%). There was no significant difference in rates of VAP (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.80–1.77; p = 0.38; I²=0.0%). Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that critically ill AECOPD patients on ventilation may not derive a significant benefit from systemic steroids. Prospero protocol No CRD420251034592.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04327-7
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of systemic corticosteroids in ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tanvi Tiwari, Eduardo Saadi Neto, Frederico Augusto Travi Squizzato, Felix Reyes
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Role of systemic corticosteroids in ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tanvi Tiwari, Eduardo Saadi Neto, Frederico Augusto Travi Squizzato, Felix Reyes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The recommendation regarding systemic corticosteroids in ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is unknown since most studies have excluded ventilated patients. Our study aims to investigate whether systemic steroids benefit the subgroup of AECOPD who require ventilation. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for randomized trials or observational studies comparing systemic steroids to placebo or no systemic steroids, up to April 2025. Outcomes of interest were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, length of ICU stay, duration of ventilation, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure rate, hyperglycemia episodes, and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Results Six studies including 1596 ventilated AECOPD patients (including subgroups from larger ICU populations), were included in the systematic review. Of these 1424 contributed to the quantitative synthesis of at least one outcome. We performed sensitivity analysis for study type and mode of ventilation. ICU mortality was not significantly decreased in the systemic steroid group compared to placebo or no systemic steroids (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.09; 95% CI 0.62–1.91; p = 0.78; I²=0.0%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for duration of ventilation (Mean difference (MD) = -2.24; 95% CI -5.13 to 0.66; p = 0.13; I²=78.7%). In the subgroup of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systemic steroids were associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (MD = -1.12 days; 95% CI -2.23 to 0.00; p = 0.049; I² = 59.9%). There was no difference between groups for length of ICU stay (MD = -1.60; 95% CI -3.32 to 0.12; p = 0.068; I²=68.5%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for NIV failure (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.17; 95% CI 0.83–1.67; p = 0.37; I²=58.1%). Hyperglycemia episodes were significantly higher in the steroid group (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.56 to 3.62; p < 0.001; I²=0.0%). There was no significant difference in rates of VAP (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.80–1.77; p = 0.38; I²=0.0%). Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that critically ill AECOPD patients on ventilation may not derive a significant benefit from systemic steroids. Prospero protocol No CRD420251034592.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Mayo Clinic (US), Hagerstown Community College (US), Tucson Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.