General Theory of Layered Authority

General Theory of Layered Authority Mathematical Spine for the Six-Layer Fixed Authority Cosmology Formalizes the authority stack connecting finite obstruction, finite descent authority, representation transport, completion comparison, continuum shadow, and residual closure. The paper’s central claim is that higher layers may organize, transport, compare, complete, or expose residue, but they do not create authority. Operational authority appears only when a proposal is represented, routed, descended into a finite certified packet, verified, and terminalized into a declared authority-bearing status. The governing normal form is: Π♯ = τ♯ ∘ₖ FOC♯ ∘ₖ D♯ ∘ₖ ρ♯ ∘ₖ R♯ Aauthority is defined by the existence of an authority-bearing terminal output. The paper introduces the six conserved roles of the stack: obstruction, authority, representation transport, completion comparison, continuum shadow, and residual closure. It uses higher category theory to organize the doctrine tower, finite homological obstruction calculus to supply the verifier, and dependent-type/HoTT-style language to express authority, refusal, and certificate inhabitation. The result is a compact mathematical spine for the broader theory: difference is primitive, sameness is certified zero-difference, and authority must descend.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20274228
Primary Topic
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

General Theory of Layered Authority

JEREMY H. CARROLL
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
preprint

General Theory of Layered Authority

JEREMY H. CARROLL
preprint en

Abstract

General Theory of Layered Authority Mathematical Spine for the Six-Layer Fixed Authority Cosmology Formalizes the authority stack connecting finite obstruction, finite descent authority, representation transport, completion comparison, continuum shadow, and residual closure. The paper’s central claim is that higher layers may organize, transport, compare, complete, or expose residue, but they do not create authority. Operational authority appears only when a proposal is represented, routed, descended into a finite certified packet, verified, and terminalized into a declared authority-bearing status. The governing normal form is: Π♯ = τ♯ ∘ₖ FOC♯ ∘ₖ D♯ ∘ₖ ρ♯ ∘ₖ R♯ Aauthority is defined by the existence of an authority-bearing terminal output. The paper introduces the six conserved roles of the stack: obstruction, authority, representation transport, completion comparison, continuum shadow, and residual closure. It uses higher category theory to organize the doctrine tower, finite homological obstruction calculus to supply the verifier, and dependent-type/HoTT-style language to express authority, refusal, and certificate inhabitation. The result is a compact mathematical spine for the broader theory: difference is primitive, sameness is certified zero-difference, and authority must descend.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.