The Corvis ST analysis of underaged versus adults’ healthy eyes with comparable tomography detects softer corneas in children and adolescents as opposed to adults

Abstract This cross-sectional cohort study aimed to analyze whether corneal biomechanics differ between healthy eyes of different age, even if they appear tomographically identical. All volunteers underwent corneal Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) and biomechanical examination (Corvis ST, CST both Oculus, Germany). Three groups (G) were formed according to age: (G1) children aged 3–10 years ( n = 250, 7.7 ± 1.9 years (mean ± standard deviation)), (G2) adolescents aged 11–20 years ( n = 350, 15.3 ± 2.9 years) and (G3) adults ( n = 100, 48.7 ± 13.8 years). Main tomographic outcome parameters were: flat anterior (K1F)/posterior (K1B) and steep anterior (K2F)/posterior (K2B) meridians, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) and maximal anterior keratometry (Kmax). Considering biomechanics, these were deformation amplitude ratio 2 mm (DA ratio 2 mm), integrated radius (IR), Ambrósio Relational Thickness horizontal (ARTh), stiffness-parameter (SP-A1) and corneal velocity at inward applanation (A1 velocity), stress-strain-index (SSI), Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), Biomechanical E-Staging (BEST) and the CST-derived non-contact (IOPnct) and biomechanically adjusted intraocular pressure (bIOP). The groups were compared with Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA and Dunn’s post test. The three groups G1–G3 were tomographically comparable ( p > 0.05 for K1F/K1B/K2F/K2B/TCT/Kmax). Biomechanically, there was no difference for DA ratio 2 mm and ARTh between G1–G3. Significant differences were found for SP-A1 (G1 < G2< G3, p = 0.0125), IR (G2 < G3, p = 0.0288), A1 velocity (G1 < G2< G3, p = 0.0027), SSI (G2 < G1< G3, p < 0.0001), CBI (G3 < G2< G1, p = 0.001), BEST (G3 < G2< G1, p = 0.0015), IOPnct (G3 < G1< G2, p = 0.0006) and bIOP (G3 < G2< G1, p < 0.0001). There exist small, yet significant biomechanical differences in CST measurements between tomographically comparable healthy corneas in dependence of age indicating biomechanically weaker corneas in children than in adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52447-1
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Corvis ST analysis of underaged versus adults’ healthy eyes with comparable tomography detects softer corneas in children and adolescents as opposed to adults

Max Bofferding, Tim Berger, Yaser Abu Dail, Jessica Obst et al.
Scientific Reports
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

The Corvis ST analysis of underaged versus adults’ healthy eyes with comparable tomography detects softer corneas in children and adolescents as opposed to adults

Max Bofferding, Tim Berger, Yaser Abu Dail, Jessica Obst, Elias Flockerzi, Paul Teping, Albéric Sneyers, Julian Kahlert, Paul Kohlhas, Tommaso Paoletti, Maximilian Berger, Berthold Seitz
article en

Abstract

Abstract This cross-sectional cohort study aimed to analyze whether corneal biomechanics differ between healthy eyes of different age, even if they appear tomographically identical. All volunteers underwent corneal Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) and biomechanical examination (Corvis ST, CST both Oculus, Germany). Three groups (G) were formed according to age: (G1) children aged 3–10 years ( n = 250, 7.7 ± 1.9 years (mean ± standard deviation)), (G2) adolescents aged 11–20 years ( n = 350, 15.3 ± 2.9 years) and (G3) adults ( n = 100, 48.7 ± 13.8 years). Main tomographic outcome parameters were: flat anterior (K1F)/posterior (K1B) and steep anterior (K2F)/posterior (K2B) meridians, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) and maximal anterior keratometry (Kmax). Considering biomechanics, these were deformation amplitude ratio 2 mm (DA ratio 2 mm), integrated radius (IR), Ambrósio Relational Thickness horizontal (ARTh), stiffness-parameter (SP-A1) and corneal velocity at inward applanation (A1 velocity), stress-strain-index (SSI), Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), Biomechanical E-Staging (BEST) and the CST-derived non-contact (IOPnct) and biomechanically adjusted intraocular pressure (bIOP). The groups were compared with Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA and Dunn’s post test. The three groups G1–G3 were tomographically comparable ( p > 0.05 for K1F/K1B/K2F/K2B/TCT/Kmax). Biomechanically, there was no difference for DA ratio 2 mm and ARTh between G1–G3. Significant differences were found for SP-A1 (G1 < G2< G3, p = 0.0125), IR (G2 < G3, p = 0.0288), A1 velocity (G1 < G2< G3, p = 0.0027), SSI (G2 < G1< G3, p < 0.0001), CBI (G3 < G2< G1, p = 0.001), BEST (G3 < G2< G1, p = 0.0015), IOPnct (G3 < G1< G2, p = 0.0006) and bIOP (G3 < G2< G1, p < 0.0001). There exist small, yet significant biomechanical differences in CST measurements between tomographically comparable healthy corneas in dependence of age indicating biomechanically weaker corneas in children than in adults.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Saarland University (DE)
Universität des Saarlandes
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.