Do green and sustainable sukuk reduce CO2 emissions? The moderating role of institutional quality

Purpose Faced with the growing challenges of climate change, reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions has become a global priority. Achieving this goal requires mobilizing green finance through instruments such as Green and Sustainable Sukuk (GSSs). This study aims to investigate the effect of the issuance of GSSs on CO2 emissions and examines how institutional quality moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The study uses panel data from 12 countries that issued GSSs between 2017 and 2024. To examine the moderating effect, an interaction term is included in a dynamic panel model estimated using the two-step system Generalized Method of Moments. The moderation hypothesis is tested by adding a multiplicative term between the independent variable and the moderator to the regression specification. Findings Three main findings emerge from the analysis. First, the direct effect of GSS issuance on CO2 emissions is not statistically significant. Second, institutional quality, particularly Regulatory Quality and the Rule of Law, has a negative and significant effect, indicating that stronger institutional frameworks contribute to lower CO2 emissions. Third, the interaction between GSS issuance and institutional quality is positive and significant, suggesting that in countries with higher institutional quality, GSS issuance is associated with a slight increase in CO2 emissions rather than a reduction. This counterintuitive result may reflect rebound effects or the financing of projects that provide only partial or transitional environmental benefits. Practical implications The results indicate that GSSs are not an automatic mechanism for reducing CO2 emissions. Their environmental effectiveness depends on the quality of the institutional and regulatory framework. Therefore, policymakers should integrate clear environmental criteria into GSS design, strengthen monitoring and oversight mechanisms, and ensure alignment with national energy transition strategies. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in examining the relationship between green Islamic finance, particularly GSS issuance, and CO2 emissions, with a specific focus on the moderating role of institutional quality. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first empirical study to directly link GSS issuance, institutional quality and carbon emissions. The study therefore provides new insights into how green Islamic finance instruments interact with institutional frameworks to influence environmental outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-08-2025-0538
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do green and sustainable sukuk reduce CO2 emissions? The moderating role of institutional quality

Azzouz Elhamma
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Do green and sustainable sukuk reduce CO2 emissions? The moderating role of institutional quality

Azzouz Elhamma
article en

Abstract

Purpose Faced with the growing challenges of climate change, reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions has become a global priority. Achieving this goal requires mobilizing green finance through instruments such as Green and Sustainable Sukuk (GSSs). This study aims to investigate the effect of the issuance of GSSs on CO2 emissions and examines how institutional quality moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The study uses panel data from 12 countries that issued GSSs between 2017 and 2024. To examine the moderating effect, an interaction term is included in a dynamic panel model estimated using the two-step system Generalized Method of Moments. The moderation hypothesis is tested by adding a multiplicative term between the independent variable and the moderator to the regression specification. Findings Three main findings emerge from the analysis. First, the direct effect of GSS issuance on CO2 emissions is not statistically significant. Second, institutional quality, particularly Regulatory Quality and the Rule of Law, has a negative and significant effect, indicating that stronger institutional frameworks contribute to lower CO2 emissions. Third, the interaction between GSS issuance and institutional quality is positive and significant, suggesting that in countries with higher institutional quality, GSS issuance is associated with a slight increase in CO2 emissions rather than a reduction. This counterintuitive result may reflect rebound effects or the financing of projects that provide only partial or transitional environmental benefits. Practical implications The results indicate that GSSs are not an automatic mechanism for reducing CO2 emissions. Their environmental effectiveness depends on the quality of the institutional and regulatory framework. Therefore, policymakers should integrate clear environmental criteria into GSS design, strengthen monitoring and oversight mechanisms, and ensure alignment with national energy transition strategies. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in examining the relationship between green Islamic finance, particularly GSS issuance, and CO2 emissions, with a specific focus on the moderating role of institutional quality. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first empirical study to directly link GSS issuance, institutional quality and carbon emissions. The study therefore provides new insights into how green Islamic finance instruments interact with institutional frameworks to influence environmental outcomes.

Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Université Ibn-Tofail (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.