Linear and non-linear sliding surfaces in sliding mode control: a review

Purpose The paper surveys the evolution of sliding surface design in variable-structure control with sliding modes. It contrasts linear and nonlinear approaches, outlining how the choice of sliding surface fundamentally shapes closed-loop dynamics. The purpose is to provide researchers and practitioners with a consolidated roadmap to select sliding surfaces that balance simplicity, robustness, and performance for modern control applications. Design/methodology/approach This work systematically reviews classical linear surfaces including proportional, PI/PD, integral, and dynamic extensions and modern nonlinear variants such as terminal, nonsingular terminal, fast terminal, integral terminal, and higher-order surfaces. The methodology involves comparing their convergence properties, robustness to uncertainties, sensitivity to disturbances, and practical implementation challenges such as noise amplification, parameter tuning, and chattering. Findings Linear sliding surfaces deliver predictable exponential convergence and strong disturbance rejection but face limitations under severe uncertainties, noise, and actuator constraints. Nonlinear designs achieve finite-time or prescribed-time convergence, improve robustness against friction and modeling errors, and reduce tracking errors. However, they often introduce greater noise sensitivity and tuning complexity. By contrasting these trade-offs, the survey highlights that no single design is universally optimal, and emphasizes the importance of tailoring surface selection to application-specific demands. Originality/value This survey uniquely bridges the gap between classical linear and emerging nonlinear sliding surface designs by presenting a comparative perspective that emphasizes their trade-offs and complementary strengths. Unlike prior works that focus narrowly on either theory or a specific class of surfaces, this study integrates diverse approaches into a coherent framework. It provides actionable insights for selecting and tailoring sliding surfaces to contemporary control challenges, thereby serving as a practical reference for both academic researchers and practicing engineers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Computations
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ec-08-2025-0939
Primary Topic
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear and non-linear sliding surfaces in sliding mode control: a review

Sandeep Gupta
Engineering Computations
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
article

Linear and non-linear sliding surfaces in sliding mode control: a review

Sandeep Gupta
article en

Abstract

Purpose The paper surveys the evolution of sliding surface design in variable-structure control with sliding modes. It contrasts linear and nonlinear approaches, outlining how the choice of sliding surface fundamentally shapes closed-loop dynamics. The purpose is to provide researchers and practitioners with a consolidated roadmap to select sliding surfaces that balance simplicity, robustness, and performance for modern control applications. Design/methodology/approach This work systematically reviews classical linear surfaces including proportional, PI/PD, integral, and dynamic extensions and modern nonlinear variants such as terminal, nonsingular terminal, fast terminal, integral terminal, and higher-order surfaces. The methodology involves comparing their convergence properties, robustness to uncertainties, sensitivity to disturbances, and practical implementation challenges such as noise amplification, parameter tuning, and chattering. Findings Linear sliding surfaces deliver predictable exponential convergence and strong disturbance rejection but face limitations under severe uncertainties, noise, and actuator constraints. Nonlinear designs achieve finite-time or prescribed-time convergence, improve robustness against friction and modeling errors, and reduce tracking errors. However, they often introduce greater noise sensitivity and tuning complexity. By contrasting these trade-offs, the survey highlights that no single design is universally optimal, and emphasizes the importance of tailoring surface selection to application-specific demands. Originality/value This survey uniquely bridges the gap between classical linear and emerging nonlinear sliding surface designs by presenting a comparative perspective that emphasizes their trade-offs and complementary strengths. Unlike prior works that focus narrowly on either theory or a specific class of surfaces, this study integrates diverse approaches into a coherent framework. It provides actionable insights for selecting and tailoring sliding surfaces to contemporary control challenges, thereby serving as a practical reference for both academic researchers and practicing engineers.

Engineering Computations
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Linear and non-linear sliding surfaces in sliding mode control: a review — Sandeep Gupta · Engineering Computations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS