“Barricades Across the Road to Democracy”: The Referendum and the Crisis of Parliamentarism in Europe, 1890–1930

During the first decades of the twentieth century, the word “democracy” was rarely used to describe existing political systems. Rather, it was usually employed polemically to criticize European parliamentary regimes for their incapacity to actualize the principle of popular power. Critiques of parliamentarism in the name of democracy were numerous and came from all sides of the political spectrum. This paper analyses them through the lens offered by debates about the use of the referendum. The “direct appeal to the people” was widely discussed at the turn between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: It was the lowest common denominator of otherwise highly divergent political projects, all of which appealed to democracy to overcome the failures of parliamentarism. Yet their diagnoses of what was wrong with parliamentary regimes differed widely, as did their interpretations of the democratic nature of the referendum. In what follows, I will analyze three different critiques of parliamentarism, and their corresponding theories of democracy, as outlined through debates about the referendum in Europe from 1890 to 1935.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Theory
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917261448201
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Barricades Across the Road to Democracy”: The Referendum and the Crisis of Parliamentarism in Europe, 1890–1930

Lucia Rubinelli
Political Theory
Political Theory and Influence
article

“Barricades Across the Road to Democracy”: The Referendum and the Crisis of Parliamentarism in Europe, 1890–1930

Lucia Rubinelli
article en

Abstract

During the first decades of the twentieth century, the word “democracy” was rarely used to describe existing political systems. Rather, it was usually employed polemically to criticize European parliamentary regimes for their incapacity to actualize the principle of popular power. Critiques of parliamentarism in the name of democracy were numerous and came from all sides of the political spectrum. This paper analyses them through the lens offered by debates about the use of the referendum. The “direct appeal to the people” was widely discussed at the turn between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: It was the lowest common denominator of otherwise highly divergent political projects, all of which appealed to democracy to overcome the failures of parliamentarism. Yet their diagnoses of what was wrong with parliamentary regimes differed widely, as did their interpretations of the democratic nature of the referendum. In what follows, I will analyze three different critiques of parliamentarism, and their corresponding theories of democracy, as outlined through debates about the referendum in Europe from 1890 to 1935.

Political Theory
Yale University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Theory and Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Barricades Across the Road to Democracy”: The Referendum and the Crisis of Parliamentarism in Europe, 1890–1930 — Lucia Rubinelli · Political Theory (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS