Susceptibility‐Guided Versus Empirical Therapy for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Infection in a High Resistance Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Clarithromycin resistance is a major determinant of treatment failure, and the benefits of susceptibility-guided therapy in high-resistance settings remains incompletely understood. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the susceptibility-guided compared with the empirical therapy in treatment-naïve H. pylori infection in a high resistance setting. In this single-centre, randomised, superiority trial, 500 treatment-naïve adults were allocated (1:1) to susceptibility-guided sequential therapy (SGT) or empirical clarithromycin -containing quadruple therapy (ET). Clarithromycin and levofloxacin antimicrobial resistance were determined using PCR. The primary endpoint was first-line eradication in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Sensitivity analyses were performed using complete-case and multiple imputation approaches. Among the 494 analysed participants (244 SGT, 250 ET), resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin was 69.3% and 51.6%, respectively. In the ITT analysis, first-line eradication was achieved in 59.8% of participants in the SGT group and 62.8% in the ET group [absolute risk difference -3.0%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.882, 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.614-1.268), p = 0.499]. Per-protocol eradication rates were 84.4% and 89.7%, respectively [absolute risk difference -5.3%; OR = 0.620, 95% CI (0.328-1.173), p = 0.139]. Notably, despite a clarithromycin resistance rate approaching 70%, empirical clarithromycin-containing quadruple therapy achieved a high per-protocol eradication rate. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. In a high resistance region, PCR-based susceptibility-guided sequential therapy did not demonstrate superiority over empirical treatment. However, empirical clarithromycin -containing quadruple therapy maintained satisfactory efficacy. Overall, these findings have implications for treatment strategy selection in high-resistance microbiological settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT05549115.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MicrobiologyOpen
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70313
Primary Topic
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Susceptibility‐Guided Versus Empirical Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in a High Resistance Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Kemei Lu, Cuicui Lang, Jinyan Wang, Lina Zang et al.
MicrobiologyOpen
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
article

Susceptibility‐Guided Versus Empirical Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in a High Resistance Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Kemei Lu, Cuicui Lang, Jinyan Wang, Lina Zang, Chunhong Xu, Jingrun Zhao, Ying Mu, Qian Feng, Xuefei Zou, Lifeng Liu, Xuechao Yang, Weiwei Sang
article en

Abstract

Clarithromycin resistance is a major determinant of treatment failure, and the benefits of susceptibility-guided therapy in high-resistance settings remains incompletely understood. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the susceptibility-guided compared with the empirical therapy in treatment-naïve H. pylori infection in a high resistance setting. In this single-centre, randomised, superiority trial, 500 treatment-naïve adults were allocated (1:1) to susceptibility-guided sequential therapy (SGT) or empirical clarithromycin -containing quadruple therapy (ET). Clarithromycin and levofloxacin antimicrobial resistance were determined using PCR. The primary endpoint was first-line eradication in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Sensitivity analyses were performed using complete-case and multiple imputation approaches. Among the 494 analysed participants (244 SGT, 250 ET), resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin was 69.3% and 51.6%, respectively. In the ITT analysis, first-line eradication was achieved in 59.8% of participants in the SGT group and 62.8% in the ET group [absolute risk difference -3.0%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.882, 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.614-1.268), p = 0.499]. Per-protocol eradication rates were 84.4% and 89.7%, respectively [absolute risk difference -5.3%; OR = 0.620, 95% CI (0.328-1.173), p = 0.139]. Notably, despite a clarithromycin resistance rate approaching 70%, empirical clarithromycin-containing quadruple therapy achieved a high per-protocol eradication rate. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. In a high resistance region, PCR-based susceptibility-guided sequential therapy did not demonstrate superiority over empirical treatment. However, empirical clarithromycin -containing quadruple therapy maintained satisfactory efficacy. Overall, these findings have implications for treatment strategy selection in high-resistance microbiological settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT05549115.

MicrobiologyOpenVol. 15(3)
Jinan Central Hospital (CN), Shandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Liaocheng People's Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.