Disentangling socioeconomic status effects: how student- and school-level socioeconomic status interact in track recommendations and track transitioning

Abstract In tracked educational systems, students are sorted into hierarchical secondary education tracks, based on track recommendations at the end of primary education. While socioeconomic status (SES) has been consistently linked to higher track recommendations, less is known about its role in track transitioning during secondary education. Furthermore, the influence of school-level SES (average SES composition of a school) on these outcomes has been underexplored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine SES-related disparities in both track recommendations at the end of primary education and track transitioning during secondary education, while disentangling the effects of both student-level (L1) and school-level (L2) SES. Utilizing longitudinal data from 673 primary schools ( n = 17,918 students) and 190 secondary schools ( n = 3,271 students), multilevel analyses were conducted to disentangle these effects. Results indicate that SES-related disparities are primarily situated at the student-level (L1); students from higher-SES backgrounds were more likely to receive higher track recommendations and experience upward track transitioning in comparison to their lower-SES peers, even when controlled for achievement. However, the effects of student-level SES on both track recommendations and track transitioning varied significantly between schools, with some schools granting lower-SES students the benefit of the doubt while others adopt a more cautious approach. Particularly in higher-SES schools, lower-SES students were more likely to receive lower track recommendations and to transition downward compared to their higher-SES peers. School-level (L2) SES did not independently influence track recommendations or track transitioning. The findings of this study underscore the importance of considering both student-level factors and between-school variability when addressing SES-related disparities in track recommendations and track transitioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-026-10218-w
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling socioeconomic status effects: how student- and school-level socioeconomic status interact in track recommendations and track transitioning

Lisette Hornstra, Anne van Leest, Ruth Maria Schep
Social Psychology of Education
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Disentangling socioeconomic status effects: how student- and school-level socioeconomic status interact in track recommendations and track transitioning

Lisette Hornstra, Anne van Leest, Ruth Maria Schep
article en

Abstract

Abstract In tracked educational systems, students are sorted into hierarchical secondary education tracks, based on track recommendations at the end of primary education. While socioeconomic status (SES) has been consistently linked to higher track recommendations, less is known about its role in track transitioning during secondary education. Furthermore, the influence of school-level SES (average SES composition of a school) on these outcomes has been underexplored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine SES-related disparities in both track recommendations at the end of primary education and track transitioning during secondary education, while disentangling the effects of both student-level (L1) and school-level (L2) SES. Utilizing longitudinal data from 673 primary schools ( n = 17,918 students) and 190 secondary schools ( n = 3,271 students), multilevel analyses were conducted to disentangle these effects. Results indicate that SES-related disparities are primarily situated at the student-level (L1); students from higher-SES backgrounds were more likely to receive higher track recommendations and experience upward track transitioning in comparison to their lower-SES peers, even when controlled for achievement. However, the effects of student-level SES on both track recommendations and track transitioning varied significantly between schools, with some schools granting lower-SES students the benefit of the doubt while others adopt a more cautious approach. Particularly in higher-SES schools, lower-SES students were more likely to receive lower track recommendations and to transition downward compared to their higher-SES peers. School-level (L2) SES did not independently influence track recommendations or track transitioning. The findings of this study underscore the importance of considering both student-level factors and between-school variability when addressing SES-related disparities in track recommendations and track transitioning.

Social Psychology of EducationVol. 29(1)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.