Prognostic Value of Computational Pressure‐Flow Dynamics Derived FFR Measured Immediately After Successful Paclitaxel‑Coated Balloon Angioplasty for In‐Stent Restenosis Lesion

ABSTRACT Background The clinical impact of angiography‐based, computational pressure‐flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR) after paclitaxel‑coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty remains unclear. Aims To investigate the prognostic value of post‐procedural caFFR in the treatment of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) with DCB. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing DCB angioplasty for ISR at Xijing Hospital, China, between December 2015 and December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was vessel‐oriented composite endpoint (VoCE), defined as a composite of vessel‐related cardiovascular death, target‐vessel myocardial infarction (TV‐MI), and ischemia‐driven target vessel revascularization (ID‐TVR) at 3‐year, assessed at the vessel level. Results A total of 1055 vessels treated with DCB were screened, and the post‐procedural caFFR was analyzable in 999 (94.7%). At 3‐year, 149 VoCE (14.9%) and 98 ID‐TVR (9.8%) events occurred. Maximally‐selected log‐rank statistics respectively identified post‐procedural caFFR value of 0.87 and post‐procedural %DS of 28 as the optimal cutoff points to predict VoCE. Post‐procedural caFFR demonstrates the superior predictive ability for VoCE compared to post‐procedural %DS (NRI: 7.4%, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was discerned between post‐procedural caFFR value and VoCE (HR per 0.1 increase : 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53–0.98, p = 0.039). Post‐procedural caFFR ≤ 0.87 group was associated with a 1.5‐fold increase in the risk of VoCE (HR IPTW : 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02–2.29) and a 1.8‐fold increase in ID‐TVR (HR IPTW : 1.82, 95% CI: 1.15–2.89). Conclusions A higher post‐procedural caFFR value is associated with improved vessel‐related clinical outcomes in patients of ISR treated by DCB. Achieving a post‐procedural caFFR value of 0.87 in the treated vessels may represent a reasonable procedural goal. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT05133921

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70653
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Value of Computational Pressure‐Flow Dynamics Derived FFR Measured Immediately After Successful Paclitaxel‑Coated Balloon Angioplasty for In‐Stent Restenosis Lesion

Wangwei Yang, Ying Liu, Fangjun Mou, Haokao Gao et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Prognostic Value of Computational Pressure‐Flow Dynamics Derived FFR Measured Immediately After Successful Paclitaxel‑Coated Balloon Angioplasty for In‐Stent Restenosis Lesion

Wangwei Yang, Ying Liu, Fangjun Mou, Haokao Gao, P W Serruys, Jianzheng Liu, Tao Hu, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Jingyu Zhou, Ling Tao, Zhiyong Yin, Chao Gao, Xingqiang He, Fei Li, Yoshinobu Onuma
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The clinical impact of angiography‐based, computational pressure‐flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR) after paclitaxel‑coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty remains unclear. Aims To investigate the prognostic value of post‐procedural caFFR in the treatment of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) with DCB. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing DCB angioplasty for ISR at Xijing Hospital, China, between December 2015 and December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was vessel‐oriented composite endpoint (VoCE), defined as a composite of vessel‐related cardiovascular death, target‐vessel myocardial infarction (TV‐MI), and ischemia‐driven target vessel revascularization (ID‐TVR) at 3‐year, assessed at the vessel level. Results A total of 1055 vessels treated with DCB were screened, and the post‐procedural caFFR was analyzable in 999 (94.7%). At 3‐year, 149 VoCE (14.9%) and 98 ID‐TVR (9.8%) events occurred. Maximally‐selected log‐rank statistics respectively identified post‐procedural caFFR value of 0.87 and post‐procedural %DS of 28 as the optimal cutoff points to predict VoCE. Post‐procedural caFFR demonstrates the superior predictive ability for VoCE compared to post‐procedural %DS (NRI: 7.4%, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was discerned between post‐procedural caFFR value and VoCE (HR per 0.1 increase : 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53–0.98, p = 0.039). Post‐procedural caFFR ≤ 0.87 group was associated with a 1.5‐fold increase in the risk of VoCE (HR IPTW : 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02–2.29) and a 1.8‐fold increase in ID‐TVR (HR IPTW : 1.82, 95% CI: 1.15–2.89). Conclusions A higher post‐procedural caFFR value is associated with improved vessel‐related clinical outcomes in patients of ISR treated by DCB. Achieving a post‐procedural caFFR value of 0.87 in the treated vessels may represent a reasonable procedural goal. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT05133921

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Xijing Hospital (CN), Air Force Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.