Grading in Gerodontology: A Framework

INTRODUCTION: Understanding and anticipating oral health deterioration in older adults requires more than describing their current oral and general health. Risk factors arising from oral, systemic and social domains strongly influence disease progression, care complexity and the ability to maintain function over time. We aimed to establish a framework for staging and grading oral health and disease in older adults, with grading systematically assessing and describing determinants of oral health deterioration. The developed framework is intended to support care planning, education, research and health-service policy. METHODS: Eight reviews examining oral, systemic and social risk factors for worsening oral health in older adults informed framework development. Additional existing reviews were also considered. A 2.5-day international workshop involving 31 experts from 13 countries was conducted, during which structured subgroup discussions and Delphi-style anonymous voting were used to refine and agree on the framework. Consensus was predefined at 75% agreement, and that was subsequently reached for all statements in a single voting round. The current paper presents the grading aspect of the developed framework; it should be used jointly with the paper on staging oral health in older adults. RESULTS: Grading encompasses three levels of risk factors: (1) oral-level factors such as dental caries risk, periodontitis risk and risks associated with the maintenance of existing dental prostheses; (2) systemic-level factors including xerostomia, multimorbidity, polypharmacy and nutritional aspects and (3) social-level factors such as social status and social support. Together, these domains reflect the likelihood of oral health deterioration, the intensity and frequency of required supportive care and the potential complexity of clinical management. Grading complements staging-which describes the current oral health status-by identifying the underlying risks shaping each older adult's oral health trajectory. CONCLUSION: Grading provides a structured, evidence-based method for assessing risk and care complexity in older adults. When combined with staging, it should enable clinicians, caregivers and policymakers to classify cases comprehensively, tailor preventive and supportive interventions, and inform resource planning, surveillance, research and education. Future work should focus on validating, disseminating and implementing the framework across diverse care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gerodontology
Published
2026-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.70051
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grading in Gerodontology: A Framework

Frauke Müller, Sabrina Maniewicz, Najla Chebib, Sayaka Tada et al.
Gerodontology
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Grading in Gerodontology: A Framework

Frauke Müller, Sabrina Maniewicz, Najla Chebib, Sayaka Tada, Annika Neri, Sophie Dartevelle, Cristiane da Mata, Koichiro Matsuo, Terry Walton, Danielle Layton, Helena Dujic, Foteini Spyraki, Kittipit Srisanoi, Anastassia Kossioni, Sungkrit Pojmonpiti, Barbara Janssens, W. Murray Thomson, Saif S. Syed, Jean‐Philippe Haesler, Manabu Kanazawa, Azize Bell, Georgios Tsakos, Murali Srinivasan, Gerry McKenna, Falk Schwendicke, Pedro Molinero Mourelle, Jennifer Gallagher, Takahiro Ono
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Understanding and anticipating oral health deterioration in older adults requires more than describing their current oral and general health. Risk factors arising from oral, systemic and social domains strongly influence disease progression, care complexity and the ability to maintain function over time. We aimed to establish a framework for staging and grading oral health and disease in older adults, with grading systematically assessing and describing determinants of oral health deterioration. The developed framework is intended to support care planning, education, research and health-service policy. METHODS: Eight reviews examining oral, systemic and social risk factors for worsening oral health in older adults informed framework development. Additional existing reviews were also considered. A 2.5-day international workshop involving 31 experts from 13 countries was conducted, during which structured subgroup discussions and Delphi-style anonymous voting were used to refine and agree on the framework. Consensus was predefined at 75% agreement, and that was subsequently reached for all statements in a single voting round. The current paper presents the grading aspect of the developed framework; it should be used jointly with the paper on staging oral health in older adults. RESULTS: Grading encompasses three levels of risk factors: (1) oral-level factors such as dental caries risk, periodontitis risk and risks associated with the maintenance of existing dental prostheses; (2) systemic-level factors including xerostomia, multimorbidity, polypharmacy and nutritional aspects and (3) social-level factors such as social status and social support. Together, these domains reflect the likelihood of oral health deterioration, the intensity and frequency of required supportive care and the potential complexity of clinical management. Grading complements staging-which describes the current oral health status-by identifying the underlying risks shaping each older adult's oral health trajectory. CONCLUSION: Grading provides a structured, evidence-based method for assessing risk and care complexity in older adults. When combined with staging, it should enable clinicians, caregivers and policymakers to classify cases comprehensively, tailor preventive and supportive interventions, and inform resource planning, surveillance, research and education. Future work should focus on validating, disseminating and implementing the framework across diverse care settings.

Gerodontology
University of Geneva (CH), University of Bern (CH), Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Queen's University Belfast (GB), The University of Sydney (AU), Chulalongkorn University (TH), The University of Queensland (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Khon Kaen University (TH), King's College London (GB), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University of Zurich (CH), FDI World Dental Federation (CH), Instituto Cajal (ES), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Cork University Hospital (IE), LMU Klinikum (DE), UNSW Sydney (AU), Ghent University (BE), Chulabhorn Hospital (TH), Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde (DE), Swiss Dental Association (CH), Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik (DE), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP), University College London (GB), University of Otago (NZ), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Osaka Dental University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.