Functional and numerical response comparison of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Tetranychus urticae Koch

Abstract Background The predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) is extensively used in biological control programs, yet quantitative comparisons of its efficacy against different pest species remain limited. This study systematically quantified and compared the functional and numerical responses of N. californicus to two economically significant pests: the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), across egg and first-instar larvae under controlled laboratory conditions. Results N. californicus exhibited a Type II functional response to all prey stages (R² = 0.955–0.994). Attack rates were 1.2–1.7 times higher for T. urticae (0.72–0.76 day⁻¹) than F. occidentalis (0.45–0.59 day⁻¹). The most pronounced difference was handling time: 7.6–9.3× times shorter for spider mites (3.7–3.9 min.) than thrips (29.5–34.7 min.), resulting in maximum predation rates of 370–385 vs. 41–49 prey day⁻¹. At operational densities (15–30 prey/arena), predation efficiency was 72.4% for spider mites vs. 53.5% for thrips. Oviposition rates were 1.39× times higher on T. urticae (2.50 ± 0.27 eggs female⁻¹ day⁻¹) than F. occidentalis (1.80 ± 0.22 eggs/ female/ day). An integrated performance index was 2.89× times higher for spider mites, with optimal predator deployment densities at 18.7 and 22.3 prey per arena for T. urticae and F. occidentalis , respectively. Conclusion N. californicus demonstrates greater predatory and reproductive performance against T. urticae compared to F. occidentalis , driven by more efficient prey handling and enhanced reproductive output under laboratory conditions. These results suggest predator: prey ratios of 1:6–1:10 as a theoretical baseline for spider mite management. These ratios represent a theoretical starting point for hypothesis generation; field validation is required before operational application. For thrips control, N. californicus should be integrated with complementary approaches. These laboratory-derived parameters provide a quantitative foundation for designing future field studies and informing the development of release strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-026-00899-y
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional and numerical response comparison of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Tetranychus urticae Koch

Atef Sayed, X Xu, Mohammad Ali Abdelhady
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

Functional and numerical response comparison of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Tetranychus urticae Koch

Atef Sayed, X Xu, Mohammad Ali Abdelhady
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) is extensively used in biological control programs, yet quantitative comparisons of its efficacy against different pest species remain limited. This study systematically quantified and compared the functional and numerical responses of N. californicus to two economically significant pests: the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), across egg and first-instar larvae under controlled laboratory conditions. Results N. californicus exhibited a Type II functional response to all prey stages (R² = 0.955–0.994). Attack rates were 1.2–1.7 times higher for T. urticae (0.72–0.76 day⁻¹) than F. occidentalis (0.45–0.59 day⁻¹). The most pronounced difference was handling time: 7.6–9.3× times shorter for spider mites (3.7–3.9 min.) than thrips (29.5–34.7 min.), resulting in maximum predation rates of 370–385 vs. 41–49 prey day⁻¹. At operational densities (15–30 prey/arena), predation efficiency was 72.4% for spider mites vs. 53.5% for thrips. Oviposition rates were 1.39× times higher on T. urticae (2.50 ± 0.27 eggs female⁻¹ day⁻¹) than F. occidentalis (1.80 ± 0.22 eggs/ female/ day). An integrated performance index was 2.89× times higher for spider mites, with optimal predator deployment densities at 18.7 and 22.3 prey per arena for T. urticae and F. occidentalis , respectively. Conclusion N. californicus demonstrates greater predatory and reproductive performance against T. urticae compared to F. occidentalis , driven by more efficient prey handling and enhanced reproductive output under laboratory conditions. These results suggest predator: prey ratios of 1:6–1:10 as a theoretical baseline for spider mite management. These ratios represent a theoretical starting point for hypothesis generation; field validation is required before operational application. For thrips control, N. californicus should be integrated with complementary approaches. These laboratory-derived parameters provide a quantitative foundation for designing future field studies and informing the development of release strategies.

Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest ControlVol. 36(1)
Suez Canal University (EG), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institute of Crop Sciences (CN), Agricultural Research Center (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund, Agricultural Research Center
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.