A Comparison of Neuropsychological Functioning Between Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Treated With Extended-Release Naltrexone or Buprenorphine-Naloxone

Background and Objectives: People with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are in safety-sensitive occupations are often not allowed to work if taking methadone or buprenorphine due to concerns about cognitive impairment from opioid agonist effects. Naltrexone, an antagonist which lacks opioid agonist effects, has fewer restrictions. However, comparisons of neurocognitive effects across treatments are limited. Methods: This post hoc analysis examined observed Trailmaking Test (TMT) difference scores and Stroop Color-Word accuracy and interference scores at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after treatment initiation with either extended-release injection naltrexone (XR-NTX) (N=283) or sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) (N=287) in a randomized, nonblinded, trial of patients with OUD. Scores were compared between medication groups across time points with linear mixed-effects regression. Results: There were no significant effects of medication group or time for either the TMT or the Stroop tests. TMT difference scores at baseline were 48.40±24.12 (XR-NTX) and 48.26±25.45 seconds (BUP-NX), with model-estimated means (SE) across post-initiation time points: XR-NTX: 37.53 (1.62); BUP-NX: 37.80 (1.51); difference: −0.26 (1.59), P =0.87; 95% CI [−3.38, 2.86]. Stroop Color-Word accuracy and interference scores at baseline were 49.65 (XR-NTX) versus 50.88 (BUP-NX) and 51.11 (XR-NTX) versus 51.68 (BUP-NX), respectively. Model estimated means (SE) across post-initiation timepoints were: accuracy: XR-NTX: 56.54 (0.90); BUP-NX: 56.22 (0.75); difference: 0.33 (0.73), P =0.65; 95% CI [−1.1, 1.76]; interference: XR-NTX: 54.15 (0.76); BUP-NX: 54.67 (0.73); difference: −0.52 (0.62), P =0.41; 95% CI [−1.74, 0.70]. Conclusions: Neurocognitive performance did not significantly differ between patients with OUD treated with XR-NTX or BUP-NX. These results suggest that absolute restrictions on buprenorphine use in safety-sensitive occupations may be unwarranted. Individual cognitive assessments may still be appropriate based on specific job demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000001717
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Neuropsychological Functioning Between Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Treated With Extended-Release Naltrexone or Buprenorphine-Naloxone

Felipe Castillo, Aimee N. C. Campbell, Jeffrey Selzer, Edward V. Nunes et al.
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

A Comparison of Neuropsychological Functioning Between Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Treated With Extended-Release Naltrexone or Buprenorphine-Naloxone

Felipe Castillo, Aimee N. C. Campbell, Jeffrey Selzer, Edward V. Nunes, Joshua Lee, Martina Pavlicová, John Rotrosen, Tse-Hwei Choo
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: People with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are in safety-sensitive occupations are often not allowed to work if taking methadone or buprenorphine due to concerns about cognitive impairment from opioid agonist effects. Naltrexone, an antagonist which lacks opioid agonist effects, has fewer restrictions. However, comparisons of neurocognitive effects across treatments are limited. Methods: This post hoc analysis examined observed Trailmaking Test (TMT) difference scores and Stroop Color-Word accuracy and interference scores at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after treatment initiation with either extended-release injection naltrexone (XR-NTX) (N=283) or sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) (N=287) in a randomized, nonblinded, trial of patients with OUD. Scores were compared between medication groups across time points with linear mixed-effects regression. Results: There were no significant effects of medication group or time for either the TMT or the Stroop tests. TMT difference scores at baseline were 48.40±24.12 (XR-NTX) and 48.26±25.45 seconds (BUP-NX), with model-estimated means (SE) across post-initiation time points: XR-NTX: 37.53 (1.62); BUP-NX: 37.80 (1.51); difference: −0.26 (1.59), P =0.87; 95% CI [−3.38, 2.86]. Stroop Color-Word accuracy and interference scores at baseline were 49.65 (XR-NTX) versus 50.88 (BUP-NX) and 51.11 (XR-NTX) versus 51.68 (BUP-NX), respectively. Model estimated means (SE) across post-initiation timepoints were: accuracy: XR-NTX: 56.54 (0.90); BUP-NX: 56.22 (0.75); difference: 0.33 (0.73), P =0.65; 95% CI [−1.1, 1.76]; interference: XR-NTX: 54.15 (0.76); BUP-NX: 54.67 (0.73); difference: −0.52 (0.62), P =0.41; 95% CI [−1.74, 0.70]. Conclusions: Neurocognitive performance did not significantly differ between patients with OUD treated with XR-NTX or BUP-NX. These results suggest that absolute restrictions on buprenorphine use in safety-sensitive occupations may be unwarranted. Individual cognitive assessments may still be appropriate based on specific job demands.

Journal of Addiction Medicine
Northwell Health (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Anna Needs Neuroblastoma Answers (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.