Bias and discrimination in healthcare through the eyes of future professionals: a qualitative study of student observations

Abstract Background Bias and discrimination by healthcare professionals threaten quality of care and disproportionately affect minorities and vulnerable individuals, thereby contradicting ethical standards of equal treatment. During professional socialisation, health profession students acquire clinical skills and internalise norms and behaviours by observing healthcare professionals. This study explored biased and discriminatory behaviour towards patients in clinical training environments, as observed by health profession students. Methods Within a cross-sectional online study ( N = 2176 students) on discrimination in healthcare at ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Switzerland, in June and September 2024, students’ experiences of witnessing biased and discriminatory patient care were assessed. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively using deductive and inductive coding according to Kuckartz. Results Out of 2176 eligible BSc and MSc healthcare students, 422 answered the question whether they had observed biased or discriminatory care of patients by healthcare staff during clinical training (response rate 19.4%). Of those, 210 (49.8%) reported witnessing such incidents and 182 specified them in free-texts. The analysis revealed a wide range of biased and discriminatory actions, most frequently withholding care, support, or medication ( n = 58), verbal discrimination ( n = 57), and ignoring patients ( n = 14). Nine accounts included physical mistreatment. Reported reasons for discrimination were ethnicity/foreign origin ( n = 48), diagnosis ( n = 35; particularly mental health), socio-economic status ( n = 9), gender ( n = 9), age ( n = 7), and disability ( n = 7). Where specified, biased and discriminatory behaviour was attributed to care-team members ( n = 45) or supervising professionals ( n = 14). Reported consequences for patients included prolonged pain, fear, and insecurity. Conclusions Healthcare students witnessed biased or discriminatory behaviour in clinical settings. This is concerning for patients, but also for students, who may internalise inequitable clinical norms during professional role formation, potentially perpetuating discrimination and contributing to health inequities. These results emphasise the need to implement educational measures (e.g., structured reflection, cultural competence, unconscious bias training), and systemic and organisational approaches to foster learning environments based on equity and respect. This includes supportive institutional frameworks, reporting systems for observed or experienced discrimination, and clinical learning environments in which equitable practice is actively modelled and reinforced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09461-8
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias and discrimination in healthcare through the eyes of future professionals: a qualitative study of student observations

Andreas Gerber‐Grote, Ursula Meidert, Frank Wieber, Laura Candolfi et al.
BMC Medical Education
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Bias and discrimination in healthcare through the eyes of future professionals: a qualitative study of student observations

Andreas Gerber‐Grote, Ursula Meidert, Frank Wieber, Laura Candolfi, Anna Gazzotto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Bias and discrimination by healthcare professionals threaten quality of care and disproportionately affect minorities and vulnerable individuals, thereby contradicting ethical standards of equal treatment. During professional socialisation, health profession students acquire clinical skills and internalise norms and behaviours by observing healthcare professionals. This study explored biased and discriminatory behaviour towards patients in clinical training environments, as observed by health profession students. Methods Within a cross-sectional online study ( N = 2176 students) on discrimination in healthcare at ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Switzerland, in June and September 2024, students’ experiences of witnessing biased and discriminatory patient care were assessed. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively using deductive and inductive coding according to Kuckartz. Results Out of 2176 eligible BSc and MSc healthcare students, 422 answered the question whether they had observed biased or discriminatory care of patients by healthcare staff during clinical training (response rate 19.4%). Of those, 210 (49.8%) reported witnessing such incidents and 182 specified them in free-texts. The analysis revealed a wide range of biased and discriminatory actions, most frequently withholding care, support, or medication ( n = 58), verbal discrimination ( n = 57), and ignoring patients ( n = 14). Nine accounts included physical mistreatment. Reported reasons for discrimination were ethnicity/foreign origin ( n = 48), diagnosis ( n = 35; particularly mental health), socio-economic status ( n = 9), gender ( n = 9), age ( n = 7), and disability ( n = 7). Where specified, biased and discriminatory behaviour was attributed to care-team members ( n = 45) or supervising professionals ( n = 14). Reported consequences for patients included prolonged pain, fear, and insecurity. Conclusions Healthcare students witnessed biased or discriminatory behaviour in clinical settings. This is concerning for patients, but also for students, who may internalise inequitable clinical norms during professional role formation, potentially perpetuating discrimination and contributing to health inequities. These results emphasise the need to implement educational measures (e.g., structured reflection, cultural competence, unconscious bias training), and systemic and organisational approaches to foster learning environments based on equity and respect. This includes supportive institutional frameworks, reporting systems for observed or experienced discrimination, and clinical learning environments in which equitable practice is actively modelled and reinforced.

BMC Medical Education
University of Konstanz (DE), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Zurich (CH), Sulzer (Switzerland) (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.