AI-augmented knowledge management in Fintech: dynamic capabilities for strategic decision-making in complex and uncertain environments

Purpose This study aims to investigate how artificial intelligence (AI) shapes knowledge management (KM) practices in FinTech and how these changes influence human judgement in strategic decision-making. It responds to the need for clearer understanding of how dynamic capabilities develop when AI is embedded in knowledge-intensive work. Design/methodology/approach This research draws on a qualitative case study of a global FinTech organisation. Data were gathered from ten semi-structured interviews with managers, KM specialists and operational staff, supported by internal documents. Thematic analysis was guided by the dynamic capabilities framework (DCF). Findings This study shows that AI-enabled KM develops through recursive and overlapping capability cycles, rather than linear stages. Three mechanisms support this process: knowledge trust and cross-functional alignment operate as ongoing preconditions for reliable AI use; mediation roles, such as Business Intelligence teams, link technical outputs with operational interpretation; and AI can ease cognitive load and improve efficiency but still requires active human judgement. These mechanisms highlight both the benefits of AI augmentation and the risks of over-reliance if knowledge or oversight structures lag behind. Research limitations/implications As a single-case study, the findings reflect one organisational context and a specific moment in time. Future research should explore how these mechanisms operate across sectors and regulatory settings. Originality/value This research extends the DCF by identifying how AI changes the microfoundations of sensing, seizing and transforming. It clarifies the role of alignment and mediation as enabling capabilities and demonstrates how KM evolves from maintaining static repositories to supporting continuous interpretation and organisational adaptability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modelling in Management
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-09-2025-0483
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-augmented knowledge management in Fintech: dynamic capabilities for strategic decision-making in complex and uncertain environments

Peeter Vihma, Ingrid Pappel, Teona Gelashvili-Luik, Fernando A.F. Ferreira
Journal of Modelling in Management
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

AI-augmented knowledge management in Fintech: dynamic capabilities for strategic decision-making in complex and uncertain environments

Peeter Vihma, Ingrid Pappel, Teona Gelashvili-Luik, Fernando A.F. Ferreira
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate how artificial intelligence (AI) shapes knowledge management (KM) practices in FinTech and how these changes influence human judgement in strategic decision-making. It responds to the need for clearer understanding of how dynamic capabilities develop when AI is embedded in knowledge-intensive work. Design/methodology/approach This research draws on a qualitative case study of a global FinTech organisation. Data were gathered from ten semi-structured interviews with managers, KM specialists and operational staff, supported by internal documents. Thematic analysis was guided by the dynamic capabilities framework (DCF). Findings This study shows that AI-enabled KM develops through recursive and overlapping capability cycles, rather than linear stages. Three mechanisms support this process: knowledge trust and cross-functional alignment operate as ongoing preconditions for reliable AI use; mediation roles, such as Business Intelligence teams, link technical outputs with operational interpretation; and AI can ease cognitive load and improve efficiency but still requires active human judgement. These mechanisms highlight both the benefits of AI augmentation and the risks of over-reliance if knowledge or oversight structures lag behind. Research limitations/implications As a single-case study, the findings reflect one organisational context and a specific moment in time. Future research should explore how these mechanisms operate across sectors and regulatory settings. Originality/value This research extends the DCF by identifying how AI changes the microfoundations of sensing, seizing and transforming. It clarifies the role of alignment and mediation as enabling capabilities and demonstrates how KM evolves from maintaining static repositories to supporting continuous interpretation and organisational adaptability.

Journal of Modelling in Management
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Tallinn University (EE), University of Memphis (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.