Where Feedback Meets Belonging: A Learner’s Perspective on Engagement in Medical Education at a US MD-Granting Institution

When we began our first year of medical school at a US MD-granting institution, we were elected as head Course Representatives (Course Reps) in a longstanding, Feedback-Driven representation model. In this reflection, we explore how serving in this role shaped students' engagement and sense of belonging in our institution through the lived experience of representation. Drawing on Student Engagement Theory as an organizing lens, we analyze our experience and those of our peers across behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions of engagement. Behaviorally, engagement was reinforced when student feedback led to visible and timely changes, demonstrating the legitimacy of the student voice and validating institutional responsiveness. Emotionally, representation functioned as a belonging cue as peers reported greater trust and psychological safety when concerns were voiced by fellow students rather than faculty. Cognitively, opacity (what students described as the "black box" of decision-making) provoked curiosity about institutional constraints and trade-offs, fostering systems-level thinking about curriculum design. Equally meaningful were the lessons we learned about ourselves. Serving as Course Reps required emotional labor we had not anticipated, including navigating the weight of peers' frustrations and advocating for diverse viewpoints we personally did not hold. Through this work, we discovered that representation can transform the representatives as much as those they represent, deepening our own sense of belonging, purpose, and agency. Our understanding evolved through sustained dialogue with classmates and our faculty mentor. By situating our lived experiences within the literature on student governance and belonging, we argue that Feedback-Driven representation systems do not just fix student concerns: they shape how students perceive their legitimacy and connection to their institution. Learners are important stakeholders whose insights and engagement meaningfully shape their educational experiences. When students are invited into authentic collaboration with faculty, they gain a sense of ownership in their education. For us, that sense of agency and belonging has been one of the most enduring lessons of medical school.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2026.2669173
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Feedback Meets Belonging: A Learner’s Perspective on Engagement in Medical Education at a US MD-Granting Institution

Ish Sethi, C. Jessica Dine, Jennifer X. Hong
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Where Feedback Meets Belonging: A Learner’s Perspective on Engagement in Medical Education at a US MD-Granting Institution

Ish Sethi, C. Jessica Dine, Jennifer X. Hong
article en

Abstract

When we began our first year of medical school at a US MD-granting institution, we were elected as head Course Representatives (Course Reps) in a longstanding, Feedback-Driven representation model. In this reflection, we explore how serving in this role shaped students' engagement and sense of belonging in our institution through the lived experience of representation. Drawing on Student Engagement Theory as an organizing lens, we analyze our experience and those of our peers across behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions of engagement. Behaviorally, engagement was reinforced when student feedback led to visible and timely changes, demonstrating the legitimacy of the student voice and validating institutional responsiveness. Emotionally, representation functioned as a belonging cue as peers reported greater trust and psychological safety when concerns were voiced by fellow students rather than faculty. Cognitively, opacity (what students described as the "black box" of decision-making) provoked curiosity about institutional constraints and trade-offs, fostering systems-level thinking about curriculum design. Equally meaningful were the lessons we learned about ourselves. Serving as Course Reps required emotional labor we had not anticipated, including navigating the weight of peers' frustrations and advocating for diverse viewpoints we personally did not hold. Through this work, we discovered that representation can transform the representatives as much as those they represent, deepening our own sense of belonging, purpose, and agency. Our understanding evolved through sustained dialogue with classmates and our faculty mentor. By situating our lived experiences within the literature on student governance and belonging, we argue that Feedback-Driven representation systems do not just fix student concerns: they shape how students perceive their legitimacy and connection to their institution. Learners are important stakeholders whose insights and engagement meaningfully shape their educational experiences. When students are invited into authentic collaboration with faculty, they gain a sense of ownership in their education. For us, that sense of agency and belonging has been one of the most enduring lessons of medical school.

Teaching and Learning in Medicine
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.