Feeling Observed? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Intense Survey Participation on Job Seekers’ Labor Market Outcomes

The authors causally identify the effects of intense survey participation on key labor market outcomes by randomly excluding individuals willing to sign up for a high-intensity survey with a focus on job search and well-being. Using administrative data, they find that, on average, survey participation had no effect on labor market outcomes during the year after signing up. They also demonstrate that an alternative selection-on-observables approach would yield misleading results. These findings underscore the value of experiments in examining effects of survey participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939261444258
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeling Observed? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Intense Survey Participation on Job Seekers’ Labor Market Outcomes

Mario Lawes, Gesine Stephan, Julia Schmidtke, Michael Eid et al.
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Feeling Observed? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Intense Survey Participation on Job Seekers’ Labor Market Outcomes

Mario Lawes, Gesine Stephan, Julia Schmidtke, Michael Eid, Clemens Hetschko
article en

Abstract

The authors causally identify the effects of intense survey participation on key labor market outcomes by randomly excluding individuals willing to sign up for a high-intensity survey with a focus on job search and well-being. Using administrative data, they find that, on average, survey participation had no effect on labor market outcomes during the year after signing up. They also demonstrate that an alternative selection-on-observables approach would yield misleading results. These findings underscore the value of experiments in examining effects of survey participation.

Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.