Artificial Intelligence in Energy Catalysis: From Catalyst Screening to Decision-Making

Machine learning is increasingly used to rank catalysts and accelerate discovery, but in energy catalysis the practical value of a model is rarely determined by ranking alone. Activity, selectivity and stability emerge from working catalysts and interfaces that depend on potential, solvent, temperature, pressure, transport and degradation, and these can differ substantially from the nominal materials used to build models. In this Review, we examine when screening-based workflows remain sufficient and when machine learning adds value beyond catalyst screening. We organize the field around three linked shifts, from static descriptors to operando-relevant representations, from offline prediction to closed-loop discovery, and from single-objective activity optimization to sustainability-aware multi-objective optimization. Using CO2 electroreduction, acidic oxygen evolution and higher alcohol synthesis as case studies, we show how these shifts can change catalyst ranking, experimental priorities and validation at the device or reactor level. We finally outline practical criteria for data reporting, extrapolative testing, uncertainty quantification and validation on the platform that defines success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science for energy and environment.
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/see.2026.100003
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Energy Catalysis: From Catalyst Screening to Decision-Making

Yan Guo, Qixin Zhou, Haifeng Shen, Haoying Wang et al.
Science for energy and environment.
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Artificial Intelligence in Energy Catalysis: From Catalyst Screening to Decision-Making

Yan Guo, Qixin Zhou, Haifeng Shen, Haoying Wang, Zhu Y, Yujie Mao, Wenjie Guo
article en

Abstract

Machine learning is increasingly used to rank catalysts and accelerate discovery, but in energy catalysis the practical value of a model is rarely determined by ranking alone. Activity, selectivity and stability emerge from working catalysts and interfaces that depend on potential, solvent, temperature, pressure, transport and degradation, and these can differ substantially from the nominal materials used to build models. In this Review, we examine when screening-based workflows remain sufficient and when machine learning adds value beyond catalyst screening. We organize the field around three linked shifts, from static descriptors to operando-relevant representations, from offline prediction to closed-loop discovery, and from single-objective activity optimization to sustainability-aware multi-objective optimization. Using CO2 electroreduction, acidic oxygen evolution and higher alcohol synthesis as case studies, we show how these shifts can change catalyst ranking, experimental priorities and validation at the device or reactor level. We finally outline practical criteria for data reporting, extrapolative testing, uncertainty quantification and validation on the platform that defines success.

Science for energy and environment.Vol. 3(1)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), City University of Hong Kong (HK), The University of Adelaide (AU), Taiyuan University of Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.