Mobilizing Vernacular Obstetric Science: The Production of Childbirth and Midwifery Knowledge in Rural Socialist China, 1940s–1970s

This article introduces the concept of “vernacular obstetric science” to explain how the Chinese Communist Party organized obstetric knowledge for rural use from the wartime base areas of the 1940s to the barefoot doctor program of the early 1970s. Drawing on midwifery manuals, training reports, and state publications, it shows how biomedically trained experts translated asepsis into local idioms, prescribed household substitutions under scarcity, and codified midwifery skills into standardized procedures. This hybrid knowledge, the article argues, formed a coherent project that made biomedicine locally legible and actionable while constraining improvisation within referral hierarchies and technocratic oversight. Tracing four phases—wartime reforms, national midwifery campaigns, the Great Leap Forward, and the barefoot doctor program—it reveals a persistent tension between revolutionary self-reliance and technocratic control. Extending accounts of “mass science” and medical pluralism, it highlights a state-orchestrated synthesis that bounded vernacular agency and prefigured the post-Mao technocratic medicalization of childbirth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern China
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00977004261433221
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobilizing Vernacular Obstetric Science: The Production of Childbirth and Midwifery Knowledge in Rural Socialist China, 1940s–1970s

Y Zhang
Modern China
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Mobilizing Vernacular Obstetric Science: The Production of Childbirth and Midwifery Knowledge in Rural Socialist China, 1940s–1970s

Y Zhang
article en

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of “vernacular obstetric science” to explain how the Chinese Communist Party organized obstetric knowledge for rural use from the wartime base areas of the 1940s to the barefoot doctor program of the early 1970s. Drawing on midwifery manuals, training reports, and state publications, it shows how biomedically trained experts translated asepsis into local idioms, prescribed household substitutions under scarcity, and codified midwifery skills into standardized procedures. This hybrid knowledge, the article argues, formed a coherent project that made biomedicine locally legible and actionable while constraining improvisation within referral hierarchies and technocratic oversight. Tracing four phases—wartime reforms, national midwifery campaigns, the Great Leap Forward, and the barefoot doctor program—it reveals a persistent tension between revolutionary self-reliance and technocratic control. Extending accounts of “mass science” and medical pluralism, it highlights a state-orchestrated synthesis that bounded vernacular agency and prefigured the post-Mao technocratic medicalization of childbirth.

Modern China
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.