The changing face of lung transplant candidates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung transplant remains the ultimate life-saving therapy for people with progressive end-stage lung disease. It is important to highlight the evolution of the field in the United States, as its development has had varying impacts on the different lung transplant candidate groups. This review seeks to synthesize current evidence on the evolution of transplantation across various patient groups, reflecting advances in medical therapies, the implementation of the new composite allocation score (CAS) and trends in lung transplant candidate groups over the years. RECENT FINDINGS: The proportion of waitlisted candidate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group A) and cystic fibrosis (group C) has declined, reflecting the impact of novel therapeutics and advanced procedural interventions. In contrast, restrictive lung disease patients (group D) now account for most lung transplant recipients, which is likely reflective of our increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygen (ECMO) for bridging and transplant centers expanded eligibility. Pulmonary hypertension patients (group B) continue to face high waitlist mortality despite the change to the new allocation scoring system. SUMMARY: Advancements in medical therapies and the new composite allocation scoring system has altered both the timing and outcomes for various transplant candidate groups. It is important that we continue to study these findings to optimize patient outcomes and organ allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000001273
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The changing face of lung transplant candidates

Daniel F. Dilling, Emily S. Clausen, Frank R. Leuzzi
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

The changing face of lung transplant candidates

Daniel F. Dilling, Emily S. Clausen, Frank R. Leuzzi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung transplant remains the ultimate life-saving therapy for people with progressive end-stage lung disease. It is important to highlight the evolution of the field in the United States, as its development has had varying impacts on the different lung transplant candidate groups. This review seeks to synthesize current evidence on the evolution of transplantation across various patient groups, reflecting advances in medical therapies, the implementation of the new composite allocation score (CAS) and trends in lung transplant candidate groups over the years. RECENT FINDINGS: The proportion of waitlisted candidate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group A) and cystic fibrosis (group C) has declined, reflecting the impact of novel therapeutics and advanced procedural interventions. In contrast, restrictive lung disease patients (group D) now account for most lung transplant recipients, which is likely reflective of our increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygen (ECMO) for bridging and transplant centers expanded eligibility. Pulmonary hypertension patients (group B) continue to face high waitlist mortality despite the change to the new allocation scoring system. SUMMARY: Advancements in medical therapies and the new composite allocation scoring system has altered both the timing and outcomes for various transplant candidate groups. It is important that we continue to study these findings to optimize patient outcomes and organ allocation.

Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Loyola University Medical Center (US), Loyola University Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.