AN EARLY OTTOMAN INTERPRETATION OF THE ALEXANDER ROMANCE: AHMEDÎ’S İSKENDERNÂME

This article examines Ahmedî’s early fifteenth-century İskendernâme, the most influential Ottoman reworking of the Alexander Romance. After tracing the multilingual transmission of Pseudo-Callisthenes through Byzantine, Islamic, and Iranian routes, it analyzes Ahmedî’s innovations, drawing chiefly on Ferdowsî and Nizâmî. The poem systematizes ideal kingship through advisory epistles attributed to Plato, Aristotle, Hippocrates, and Socrates, and recasts Indo-Iranian political theory (justice, liberality, consultation) into an Ottoman adab idiom. It also reshapes the Alexander–Gülşah episode as a mystical interlude, builds an encyclopedic cosmos spanning cosmology, astronomy/astrology, psychology, and medicine, and organizes wonder narratives (ajâib wa gharâib) thematically. The work’s epistemology pivots between Aristotle’s worldly knowledge and Khidr’s inspired lore and culminates in the Tevârîh-i Mülûk-i Âl-i Osmân section, which fuses epic, mirror-for-princes literature, encyclopedia, and dynastic historiography. Seasonal descriptions track Alexander’s life, reinforcing cyclical time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2026.1.05
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AN EARLY OTTOMAN INTERPRETATION OF THE ALEXANDER ROMANCE: AHMEDÎ’S İSKENDERNÂME

Furkan Öztürk
Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

AN EARLY OTTOMAN INTERPRETATION OF THE ALEXANDER ROMANCE: AHMEDÎ’S İSKENDERNÂME

Furkan Öztürk
article en

Abstract

This article examines Ahmedî’s early fifteenth-century İskendernâme, the most influential Ottoman reworking of the Alexander Romance. After tracing the multilingual transmission of Pseudo-Callisthenes through Byzantine, Islamic, and Iranian routes, it analyzes Ahmedî’s innovations, drawing chiefly on Ferdowsî and Nizâmî. The poem systematizes ideal kingship through advisory epistles attributed to Plato, Aristotle, Hippocrates, and Socrates, and recasts Indo-Iranian political theory (justice, liberality, consultation) into an Ottoman adab idiom. It also reshapes the Alexander–Gülşah episode as a mystical interlude, builds an encyclopedic cosmos spanning cosmology, astronomy/astrology, psychology, and medicine, and organizes wonder narratives (ajâib wa gharâib) thematically. The work’s epistemology pivots between Aristotle’s worldly knowledge and Khidr’s inspired lore and culminates in the Tevârîh-i Mülûk-i Âl-i Osmân section, which fuses epic, mirror-for-princes literature, encyclopedia, and dynastic historiography. Seasonal descriptions track Alexander’s life, reinforcing cyclical time.

Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 30(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.