Depth-Mode Leakage Signature

This record presents TA20 (Depth-Mode Leakage Signature), part of the Q5 Transport Architecture Series developed under the Zero-Point Hypothesis framework. TA20 is a control theorem rather than a prediction theorem. TA19 established that depth-mode observable deviations scale as eta times n squared in the perturbative low-mode regime. TA20 identifies the diagnostic signature that distinguishes genuine Q5 depth-mode leakage from ordinary experimental noise, systematic offset, or generic drift. It does not add new content to the leakage mechanism but provides the control structure needed for experimental interpretation of TA19. The signature consists of three necessary conditions that must hold simultaneously. The first is monotone scaling: deviation amplitude shows a trend-level monotonic increase with depth-mode frequency in the low-mode regime, up to experimental uncertainty. The second is smooth-mode null: for the gate-aligned mode with n equal to zero, the deviation vanishes or is negligible, because the constant mode has maximal overlap with the gate and minimal leakage. The third is phase-locked quadrature: the deviation appears in the cosine-phi and sine-phi quadrature basis of the T71 interference correction, with amplitude consistent with the n-squared scaling. These are necessary conditions, not sufficient ones. A deviation pattern satisfying all three is compatible with the Q5 depth-mode leakage mechanism but does not constitute proof of it. This distinction is stated explicitly and is one of the central epistemic contributions of the theorem. The three conditions test different layers of the mechanism. Monotone scaling tests spectral dependence. The smooth-mode null tests admissibility alignment and is particularly powerful because it is tied directly to the gate geometry rather than being a free parameter. Phase-locked quadrature tests phase structure and is the strongest discriminator experimentally, since a generic systematic effect would need to accidentally reproduce the specific T71 quadrature decomposition with coherent cosine and sine components and correlated scaling across mode numbers. Ordinary experimental noise generically fails at least one of the three conditions. Generic noise does not respect n-squared scaling in mode frequency. Systematic offsets do not vanish when n is equal to zero. Noise-driven deviations are not generically phase-locked to the T71 quadrature basis. The conjunction of all three conditions, therefore, provides a false-positive rejection criterion. The phase-locking condition includes a caveat: the intrinsic mechanism generates quadrature structure, but observational averaging, decoherence, or detector integration could wash out phase structure in practice. A phase-independent observation is therefore not consistent with the intrinsic mechanism at the signal level, but this must be interpreted with care in the presence of measurement imperfections. TA20 provides the control conditions that TA21 (Experimental Quadrature Extraction Protocol) will operationalize into a concrete experimental procedure. The theorem chain progressively derives the structure of the effective transport generator \[ G_eff = Pi_Y G Pi_Y + K†BK \], from which observable phase, leakage, decoherence, and residual correction emerge as structural consequences of projected transport closure on Q5.