Are risky driving, health behaviors, and cardiometabolic risk interrelated? Findings from the cooper center longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE: While risky driving behaviors and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors both have deleterious consequences, they are rarely targeted jointly. The present study examines the associations between risky driving behaviors, health-related behaviors, and cardiometabolic risk factors among adults over time. METHODS: Longitudinal examination of 17,846 adults who attended a preventive medicine clinic (Dallas, TX) at least twice (1988-2024). The primary independent variables were risky driving behaviors: not wearing a seat belt, driving after drinking alcohol, angry driving, and speeding, as well as an overall score (0-4). The dependent variables were current smoking, alcohol intake, cardiorespiratory fitness levels, and cardiometabolic risk factors. The relationships were examined using a hybrid model, which accounted for both between- and within-person variations. RESULTS: The average age of participants at baseline was 46.4 years (SD = 8.7), three-quarters (75.2%) were men, and 84.6% were college-educated. Examining variation between participants, a 1-point higher risky driving behavior total score was associated with 2.89 (95%CI 2.52, 3.33) times higher odds for current smoking, 1.61 (95%CI 1.53, 1.70) times higher odds for greater alcohol intake, and 10.0% lower odds for higher fitness (OR = 0.90; 95%CI 0.85, 0.94). Additionally, a higher total risky driving behaviors score was related to elevated cardiometabolic risk factors, such as elevated waist circumference (OR = 1.73; 95%CI 1.51, 1.97) and glucose (OR = 1.20; 95%CI 1.11, 1.30). In a within-person examination, a 1-point increase in the total risky driving behaviors score was associated with increased alcohol intake (OR = 1.09; 95%CI 1.07, 1.11), and elevated glucose (OR = 1.07; 95%CI 1.02, 1.12). When examining risky driving behaviors, not wearing a seatbelt and driving after drinking were related to three dependent variables in the within-person analyses. For example, an increase in driving after drinking was associated with increased smoking (OR = 1.26; 95%CI 1.05, 1.52), increased alcohol intake (OR = 1.51; 95%CI 1.43, 1.59), and increased glucose (OR = 1.28; 95%CI 1.15, 1.42). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that risky driving behaviors may accompany broader risk-taking tendencies across domains. Future research is warranted to determine whether targeting underlying psychological constructs can lead to improvements in both domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107089
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are risky driving, health behaviors, and cardiometabolic risk interrelated? Findings from the cooper center longitudinal study

Laura F. DeFina, Clare Meernik, Mahmoud Qadan, Bob M. Fennis et al.
Acta Psychologica
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Are risky driving, health behaviors, and cardiometabolic risk interrelated? Findings from the cooper center longitudinal study

Laura F. DeFina, Clare Meernik, Mahmoud Qadan, Bob M. Fennis, Carolyn E. Barlow, Andjelka Pavlovic, Rusty Tchernis, Tammy Leonard, Qing Li, David Leonard, Kerem Shuval
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While risky driving behaviors and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors both have deleterious consequences, they are rarely targeted jointly. The present study examines the associations between risky driving behaviors, health-related behaviors, and cardiometabolic risk factors among adults over time. METHODS: Longitudinal examination of 17,846 adults who attended a preventive medicine clinic (Dallas, TX) at least twice (1988-2024). The primary independent variables were risky driving behaviors: not wearing a seat belt, driving after drinking alcohol, angry driving, and speeding, as well as an overall score (0-4). The dependent variables were current smoking, alcohol intake, cardiorespiratory fitness levels, and cardiometabolic risk factors. The relationships were examined using a hybrid model, which accounted for both between- and within-person variations. RESULTS: The average age of participants at baseline was 46.4 years (SD = 8.7), three-quarters (75.2%) were men, and 84.6% were college-educated. Examining variation between participants, a 1-point higher risky driving behavior total score was associated with 2.89 (95%CI 2.52, 3.33) times higher odds for current smoking, 1.61 (95%CI 1.53, 1.70) times higher odds for greater alcohol intake, and 10.0% lower odds for higher fitness (OR = 0.90; 95%CI 0.85, 0.94). Additionally, a higher total risky driving behaviors score was related to elevated cardiometabolic risk factors, such as elevated waist circumference (OR = 1.73; 95%CI 1.51, 1.97) and glucose (OR = 1.20; 95%CI 1.11, 1.30). In a within-person examination, a 1-point increase in the total risky driving behaviors score was associated with increased alcohol intake (OR = 1.09; 95%CI 1.07, 1.11), and elevated glucose (OR = 1.07; 95%CI 1.02, 1.12). When examining risky driving behaviors, not wearing a seatbelt and driving after drinking were related to three dependent variables in the within-person analyses. For example, an increase in driving after drinking was associated with increased smoking (OR = 1.26; 95%CI 1.05, 1.52), increased alcohol intake (OR = 1.51; 95%CI 1.43, 1.59), and increased glucose (OR = 1.28; 95%CI 1.15, 1.42). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that risky driving behaviors may accompany broader risk-taking tendencies across domains. Future research is warranted to determine whether targeting underlying psychological constructs can lead to improvements in both domains.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 267
Texas Tech University (US), University of Groningen (NL), Georgia State University (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Cooper Institute (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Haifa (IL), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.