Prism: Private Relational Data Synthesis with Language Models
Organizations increasingly rely on relational data containing sensitive personal information for downstream tasks. A common approach is to release synthetic data as a privacy-preserving substitute, typically by learning a generative model and sampling from it. Differential privacy (DP) provides a formal guarantee of data privacy, and existing data synthesis systems aim to balance its inherent trade-off between data privacy and task utility. The advent of pretrained large language models (LLMs) has reshaped this trade-off landscape: on the utility side, LLMs possess stronger representational capabilities and encode extensive prior knowledge that does not consume the privacy budget, leading to improved task utility; on the other hand, enforcing differential privacy for LLM-based relational data synthesis introduces new technical challenges. We present P rism, an end-to-end framework for DP relational data synthesis using LLMs. P rism privatizes knowledge transfer from an ensemble of teacher LLMs to a student generator via DP output aggregation. We introduce three key innovations in the aggregation mechanism to address LLM-specific challenges, including 1) token pruning with tries to minimize teacher queries and hence the privacy cost; 2) a data-dependent DP mechanism that adaptively scales noise for efficient budget use; and 3) probabilistic sampling with threshold filtering to reduce bias and preserve diversity. Extensive empirical results across twelve experiments show that Prism achieves substantially higher predictive utility than eight state-of-the-art methods under the same privacy budget.
Authors
- Guohui Guan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0818-994X)
- Chang Ge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8788-4379)
Institutions
- University of Minnesota (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
- Published
- 2026-05-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3802102
- Primary Topic
- Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00