Neuroethics, Biocapital and the Attention Economy in the Times of Generative AI and Human–Machine Teaming

This short paper will argue that one of the most pressing issues related to the attention economy is the subjugation of cognitive capacity to conditions of neuro-capitalism, including through psychological discipline, biopolitically-weaponized mindfulness, and transhumanist interventions. In so doing, it will also consider how traditional concepts of the human fail to account for the myriad ways humans interact with technologies that may enhance or diminish their capacity to contribute to, and participate in, the attention economy. Collectively, these issues highlight an ethical obligation for those working within neuroscience to consider the biopolitical implications of their work within the capitalist paradigm of work intensification and cognitive optimization. Using the example of generative AI tools in the workplace, the paper will conclude that such innovations fall within the scope of cognitive enhancements when considered within the attention economy, where offloading cognitive load onto technology represents a productivity shortcut designed to extract more value from the human mind through human-machine teaming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-026-10560-w
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuroethics, Biocapital and the Attention Economy in the Times of Generative AI and Human–Machine Teaming

Evie Kendal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Neuroethics, Biocapital and the Attention Economy in the Times of Generative AI and Human–Machine Teaming

Evie Kendal
article en

Abstract

This short paper will argue that one of the most pressing issues related to the attention economy is the subjugation of cognitive capacity to conditions of neuro-capitalism, including through psychological discipline, biopolitically-weaponized mindfulness, and transhumanist interventions. In so doing, it will also consider how traditional concepts of the human fail to account for the myriad ways humans interact with technologies that may enhance or diminish their capacity to contribute to, and participate in, the attention economy. Collectively, these issues highlight an ethical obligation for those working within neuroscience to consider the biopolitical implications of their work within the capitalist paradigm of work intensification and cognitive optimization. Using the example of generative AI tools in the workplace, the paper will conclude that such innovations fall within the scope of cognitive enhancements when considered within the attention economy, where offloading cognitive load onto technology represents a productivity shortcut designed to extract more value from the human mind through human-machine teaming.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.