Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (BEVAR) to Rescue Failed Complex EVAR (C-EVAR): Technical Challenges and Outcomes in a 12-Case Series

Background: Complex EVAR is a well-established option for treating complex aortic pathologies. However, depending on the type of it, long-term effectiveness is often compromised. For example, chimney EVAR is related to type IA endoleaks related to the gutter and proximal neck degeneration, late failures after fenestrated or branched EVAR are rare. Although redo-endovascular procedures are recommended for failed repairs, the use of branched endoprostheses (BEVAR) to address failed Complex EVAR (C-EVAR) cases is rarely documented. This study aims to evaluate the technical feasibility and 30-day outcomes of using BEVAR as a definitive rescue strategy for these patients. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on a series of twelve patients who had previously undergone failed C-EVAR. Clinical and procedure-related variables were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata v18.0 software. Results: The reasons for reintervention were type Ia endoleak (ten patients), type Ib (one patient), and type III + Ia (one patient). Branched devices were used: eleven patients received the Zenith t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), and one received the G-Branch device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China). Technical and clinical success was achieved in 11 out of 12 patients (91.7%). One perioperative death (due to haemothorax and sepsis) and three major complications were recorded in the first 30 days following repair. No patient of this cohort was deemed fit enough for open conversion. Imaging follow-up at 30 days revealed two type I leaks and seven type II leaks, with no type III leaks recorded. Patency was maintained in all treated visceral vessels (the celiac trunk, the superior mesenteric artery, and the renal arteries) in survivors. Conclusions: Repairing failed C-EVAR using branched endovascular aneurysm repair is a feasible and effective technique. This approach can resolve complex issues such as proximal sealing and component integrity failures, successfully excluding the aneurysmal sac while avoiding the morbidity and mortality associated with open surgery in high-risk patients.