Practical exploration of real‐time visual interactive artificial intelligence technology in cytopathology education

ABSTRACT Background Proficiency in cytopathologic diagnosis depends heavily on extensive hands‐on practice and immediate error correction. Traditional teaching models, however, are constrained by limited practice opportunities and delayed feedback, which fails to meet the core skill‐development needs of residents. Methods In total, 45 pathology residents were enrolled and assigned to two groups. The experimental group ( n = 20) adopted a tripartite teacher–artificial intelligence–resident collaborative teaching model, whereas the control group ( n = 25) received conventional instruction. Both groups underwent an identical 8‐week teaching cycle. Results The questionnaire results from the experimental group indicated that 19 of 20 residents (9%) deemed the new model highly necessary, and 15 of 20 (75%) believed it significantly improved their diagnostic competence. Semistructured interviews further revealed that the model enhanced diagnostic ability, facilitated personalized learning, and alleviated learning anxiety. For objective metrics, the experimental group demonstrated a significantly higher postintervention concordance rate for gray‐zone cell identification (78.65%) compared with both their preintervention baseline (64.38%) and the contemporaneous control group (66.84%; t = 8.962; p < .001). In addition, the experimental group exhibited a markedly faster diagnostic speed (mean ± standard deviation, 3.05 ± 0.52 minutes per case) compared with their preintervention performance (5.92 ± 0.85 minutes per case) and the control group (5.63 ± 0.79 minutes per case; t = 14.821; p < .001). No statistically significant changes were observed in the control group ( p > .05). Conclusions This study demonstrates that artificial intelligence technology integrated with real‐time visual interaction effectively improves the cytopathologic diagnostic skills of residents and merits wider promotion in pathology education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Cytopathology
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.70097
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical exploration of real‐time visual interactive artificial intelligence technology in cytopathology education

Q Wang, Lulu Rong, Y L Zhu, Yi-Xiang Wang et al.
Cancer Cytopathology
AI in cancer detection
article

Practical exploration of real‐time visual interactive artificial intelligence technology in cytopathology education

Q Wang, Lulu Rong, Y L Zhu, Yi-Xiang Wang, Wenhao Ren, J Lu, Chunhua Cheng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Proficiency in cytopathologic diagnosis depends heavily on extensive hands‐on practice and immediate error correction. Traditional teaching models, however, are constrained by limited practice opportunities and delayed feedback, which fails to meet the core skill‐development needs of residents. Methods In total, 45 pathology residents were enrolled and assigned to two groups. The experimental group ( n = 20) adopted a tripartite teacher–artificial intelligence–resident collaborative teaching model, whereas the control group ( n = 25) received conventional instruction. Both groups underwent an identical 8‐week teaching cycle. Results The questionnaire results from the experimental group indicated that 19 of 20 residents (9%) deemed the new model highly necessary, and 15 of 20 (75%) believed it significantly improved their diagnostic competence. Semistructured interviews further revealed that the model enhanced diagnostic ability, facilitated personalized learning, and alleviated learning anxiety. For objective metrics, the experimental group demonstrated a significantly higher postintervention concordance rate for gray‐zone cell identification (78.65%) compared with both their preintervention baseline (64.38%) and the contemporaneous control group (66.84%; t = 8.962; p < .001). In addition, the experimental group exhibited a markedly faster diagnostic speed (mean ± standard deviation, 3.05 ± 0.52 minutes per case) compared with their preintervention performance (5.92 ± 0.85 minutes per case) and the control group (5.63 ± 0.79 minutes per case; t = 14.821; p < .001). No statistically significant changes were observed in the control group ( p > .05). Conclusions This study demonstrates that artificial intelligence technology integrated with real‐time visual interaction effectively improves the cytopathologic diagnostic skills of residents and merits wider promotion in pathology education.

Cancer CytopathologyVol. 134(6)
Capital Medical University (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University (CN), Ministry of Education (ET)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.