Impact of Insecticide-Treated Nets on Plasmodium falciparum Infection Rates: A Meta-Analysis

Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), particularly long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs), are important for malaria control; however, the rise of insecticide resistance, behavioral adaptations in mosquito vectors, and diminishing net durability may affect their efficacy. The objective of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis to synthesize recent epidemiological evidence (2021–2025) on the correlation between ITN/LLIN use and Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence and to explore sources of heterogeneity across populations, settings, and type of nets. Searches across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science yielded 3151 records, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. Two separate meta-analyses were performed for crude and adjusted effect estimates using random-effects models. The crude-effects meta-analysis included six studies comprising 7466 participants and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.42–1.07; p = 0.078), indicating no statistically significant association between ITN/LLIN use and P. falciparum infection. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 79.8%), which was partially explained by population type (59.3%) and study design (36.1%). Subgroup analysis revealed comparable infection prevalence–based associations for ITNs (OR = 0.72) and LLINs (OR = 0.59) use. Assessment of publication bias indicated slight asymmetry; however, the trim-and-fill adjustment did not significantly change the conclusions. The adjusted-effects meta-analysis, comprising nine studies, yielded a non-significant pooled effect (aOR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.42–1.86; p = 0.71) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 88.7%). Meta-regression analyses indicated that effect estimates varied by population group and country, with statistically significant modifiers observed for children under five years (p = 0.0098) and for studies conducted in Uganda (p = 0.0378). The type of net contributed to variation between studies, with insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) exhibiting lower pooled odds than long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) (p = 0.0415). Overall, this meta-analysis found no conclusive evidence of a statistically significant association between ITN/LLIN use and P. falciparum infection in contemporary epidemiological studies. The substantial heterogeneity across settings underscores the context-dependent nature of observed associations and highlights the need for integrated vector-control strategies and continued evaluation of net technologies under conditions of increasing resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed11050137
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Insecticide-Treated Nets on Plasmodium falciparum Infection Rates: A Meta-Analysis

Ching Siang Tan, Ayşe Çalmaz, Merve Ayyıldız Akın, Annaev Umidjon et al.
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Malaria Research and Control
article

Impact of Insecticide-Treated Nets on Plasmodium falciparum Infection Rates: A Meta-Analysis

Ching Siang Tan, Ayşe Çalmaz, Merve Ayyıldız Akın, Annaev Umidjon, Kuvonchbek Egamberdiyev, Nevra Karaca Biçakçi, Babatunji E. Oyinloye, Jayanthi Barasarathi, Intizor Avazmetova
article en

Abstract

Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), particularly long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs), are important for malaria control; however, the rise of insecticide resistance, behavioral adaptations in mosquito vectors, and diminishing net durability may affect their efficacy. The objective of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis to synthesize recent epidemiological evidence (2021–2025) on the correlation between ITN/LLIN use and Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence and to explore sources of heterogeneity across populations, settings, and type of nets. Searches across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science yielded 3151 records, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. Two separate meta-analyses were performed for crude and adjusted effect estimates using random-effects models. The crude-effects meta-analysis included six studies comprising 7466 participants and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.42–1.07; p = 0.078), indicating no statistically significant association between ITN/LLIN use and P. falciparum infection. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 79.8%), which was partially explained by population type (59.3%) and study design (36.1%). Subgroup analysis revealed comparable infection prevalence–based associations for ITNs (OR = 0.72) and LLINs (OR = 0.59) use. Assessment of publication bias indicated slight asymmetry; however, the trim-and-fill adjustment did not significantly change the conclusions. The adjusted-effects meta-analysis, comprising nine studies, yielded a non-significant pooled effect (aOR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.42–1.86; p = 0.71) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 88.7%). Meta-regression analyses indicated that effect estimates varied by population group and country, with statistically significant modifiers observed for children under five years (p = 0.0098) and for studies conducted in Uganda (p = 0.0378). The type of net contributed to variation between studies, with insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) exhibiting lower pooled odds than long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) (p = 0.0415). Overall, this meta-analysis found no conclusive evidence of a statistically significant association between ITN/LLIN use and P. falciparum infection in contemporary epidemiological studies. The substantial heterogeneity across settings underscores the context-dependent nature of observed associations and highlights the need for integrated vector-control strategies and continued evaluation of net technologies under conditions of increasing resistance.

Tropical Medicine and Infectious DiseaseVol. 11(5)
University of Zululand (ZA), INTI International University (MY), Kafkas University (TR), Urgench State University (UZ), Hitit Üniversitesi (TR), Afe Babalola University (NG), Nilai University (MY), Termez State University (UZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.