Global prevalence of dyspnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Dyspnoea is a common subjective experience associated with decreased exercise tolerance and mortality. Although several studies have explored its prevalence in the general population, there has been limited synthesis over broad income settings, particularly low-income countries. This review and meta-analysis aims to address these gaps by reviewing the global prevalence of dyspnoea across low, middle, and high-income countries and associated factors. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were completed evaluating the prevalence of dyspnoea in the general population and associated factors including age, BMI, smoking status, underlying conditions, lung function indices and country of residence. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022374929). RESULTS: Of 13,504 records screened, 56 studies were included with a total of 450,520 participants. Using the mMRC Dyspnoea Scale, (n = 43), the pooled prevalence of dyspnoea was 22.2% [95% CI 17.5-27.2]. 6.1% [95% CI 4.3-8.2] reported moderate dyspnoea (mMRC 2), 2.5% [95% CI 1.5-3.6] described moderate-severe dyspnoea (mMRC 3), and 1.2% [95% CI 0.7-1.9] reported severe dyspnoea (mMRC 4). Women reported more dyspnoea than men (6.7% vs. 4.3%). Rates of dyspnoea were higher in North America than in Australia/New Zealand (29.4% vs. 19.6%). No clear differences were noted between low-income countries and high-income countries, although data were limited. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates a high burden of dyspnoea, affecting one in five adults in the general global population. Dyspnoea prevalence was higher in women and there was significant geographical variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04339-3
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global prevalence of dyspnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chamara V. Senaratna, M Howard, Christine F. McDonald, Su‐Wei Khung et al.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Global prevalence of dyspnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chamara V. Senaratna, M Howard, Christine F. McDonald, Su‐Wei Khung, Maitri Munsif, Shyamali C. Dharmage, Fergal O’Donoghue, Yuxin Jiao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dyspnoea is a common subjective experience associated with decreased exercise tolerance and mortality. Although several studies have explored its prevalence in the general population, there has been limited synthesis over broad income settings, particularly low-income countries. This review and meta-analysis aims to address these gaps by reviewing the global prevalence of dyspnoea across low, middle, and high-income countries and associated factors. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were completed evaluating the prevalence of dyspnoea in the general population and associated factors including age, BMI, smoking status, underlying conditions, lung function indices and country of residence. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022374929). RESULTS: Of 13,504 records screened, 56 studies were included with a total of 450,520 participants. Using the mMRC Dyspnoea Scale, (n = 43), the pooled prevalence of dyspnoea was 22.2% [95% CI 17.5-27.2]. 6.1% [95% CI 4.3-8.2] reported moderate dyspnoea (mMRC 2), 2.5% [95% CI 1.5-3.6] described moderate-severe dyspnoea (mMRC 3), and 1.2% [95% CI 0.7-1.9] reported severe dyspnoea (mMRC 4). Women reported more dyspnoea than men (6.7% vs. 4.3%). Rates of dyspnoea were higher in North America than in Australia/New Zealand (29.4% vs. 19.6%). No clear differences were noted between low-income countries and high-income countries, although data were limited. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates a high burden of dyspnoea, affecting one in five adults in the general global population. Dyspnoea prevalence was higher in women and there was significant geographical variation.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine
The University of Melbourne (AU), Institute for Breathing and Sleep (AU), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU), Victoria University (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.